Skip to content

Conversation

@packrat386
Copy link
Contributor

@packrat386 packrat386 commented Nov 12, 2025

Resolves #785

Before the change?

request: is nested under options: in the README.

After the change?

request: is passed at the same level as username: and headers: in the README.

Pull request checklist

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been reviewed and added / updated if needed (for bug fixes / features)

Does this introduce a breaking change?

Please see our docs on breaking changes to help!

  • Yes
  • No

@octokit
Copy link

octokit bot commented Nov 12, 2025

👋 Hi! Thank you for this contribution! Just to let you know, our GitHub SDK team does a round of issue and PR reviews twice a week, every Monday and Friday! We have a process in place for prioritizing and responding to your input. Because you are a part of this community please feel free to comment, add to, or pick up any issues/PRs that are labeled with Status: Up for grabs. You & others like you are the reason all of this works! So thank you & happy coding! 🚀

`request:` is nested under `options:` in the readme but in reality it's
passed at the same level as `username:` and `headers:`.

Resolves octokit#785
@packrat386 packrat386 force-pushed the fix_readme_custom_agent branch from 73f63be to a42b3f0 Compare November 12, 2025 22:29
@wolfy1339 wolfy1339 merged commit f17c1c1 into octokit:main Nov 13, 2025
7 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🆕 Triage to ✅ Done in 🧰 Octokit Active Nov 13, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 10.0.7 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

Status: ✅ Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[DOCS]: Options for custom agent are incorrect

2 participants