-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.6k
[ADD] Quality: Pass - Fail quality checks #5884
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
1918d79 to
4b1510c
Compare
|
@odoo/us-doc-review |
4b1510c to
1eeaa7a
Compare
1eeaa7a to
4fa3c4d
Compare
Felicious
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a really really solid doc, @hojo-odoo 😄
It's concise and really easy to follow. I just had some minor typos I found and a VS Code tip I wanted to share. I think it'll be helpful for you while working on a lot of duplicate content 😊
Go ahead and pass this to the next reviewer after fixing the typos!
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
4fa3c4d to
8f48fd9
Compare
ksc-odoo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hojo-odoo great work on this doc! once you give these suggested edits a look, and implement the necessary adjustments, I think this one will be ready for the next stage. nicely done 👍
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
8f48fd9 to
81a1770
Compare
samueljlieber
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @hojo-odoo! Nice work on this PR 🙂 I have only one small change after my technical review. I will push up this change after this review to move this PR forward!
Thank you!
content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/quality/quality_check_types/pass_fail_check.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
81a1770 to
d2a4caa
Compare
|
Implemented my change in d2a4caa. This PR is all set @StraubCreative 👍 |
|
@robodoo r+ |
closes #5884 Signed-off-by: Zachary Straub (zst) <zst@odoo.com>
This PR adds a new doc detailing how to create and process Pass - Fail quality checks.
NOTE: One of the checks is failing because the PR contains a reference to the "Quality checks" doc, which is not yet live. That doc should be live before this one, at which point the ref tags in this doc will work as intended.