Skip to content

Conversation

@eapa-odoo
Copy link
Contributor

@eapa-odoo eapa-odoo commented Dec 10, 2024

  • Merged the following modules into l10n_in:
    • l10n_in_gstin_status
    • l10n_in_withholding

task: 3980324

ENT PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/75451
UPGRADE PR: https://github.com/odoo/upgrade/pull/6931

@robodoo
Copy link
Contributor

robodoo commented Dec 10, 2024

Pull request status dashboard

@C3POdoo C3POdoo added the RD research & development, internal work label Dec 10, 2024
@eapa-odoo eapa-odoo force-pushed the master-l10n_in-merge-modules-eapa branch from 5caf23d to 325e7da Compare December 11, 2024 07:15
@eapa-odoo eapa-odoo force-pushed the master-l10n_in-merge-modules-eapa branch from 325e7da to 5bd1c4f Compare December 12, 2024 10:27
@eapa-odoo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello, @jva-odoo
I have pushed the code, can you please have a look?

@eapa-odoo eapa-odoo force-pushed the master-l10n_in-merge-modules-eapa branch 4 times, most recently from 5c8192e to c21d6ba Compare December 12, 2024 18:14
@eapa-odoo eapa-odoo force-pushed the master-l10n_in-merge-modules-eapa branch from c21d6ba to 62ca514 Compare December 13, 2024 09:00
@eapa-odoo eapa-odoo marked this pull request as ready for review December 13, 2024 09:09
@C3POdoo C3POdoo requested review from a team and hupo-odoo and removed request for a team December 13, 2024 09:11
Copy link
Contributor

@jco-odoo jco-odoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not clear to me why e.g. the l10n_in_edi_feature field is defined in l10n_in and not in l10n_in_edi.

@jco-odoo
Copy link
Contributor

jco-odoo commented Dec 13, 2024

Not sure why TCS/TDS is checked by default. Maybe we should have a demo TAN as well? (probably the onchange not been triggered (or should we make it compute?)) Also, is there a way to avoid the TAN twice? The split of TCS/TDS is on purpose?

image

@eapa-odoo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not sure why TCS/TDS is checked by default. Maybe we should have a demo TAN as well? (probably the onchange not been triggered (or should we make it compute?)) Also, is there a way to avoid the TAN twice? The split of TCS/TDS is on purpose?

image

Yes, the split between TCS and TDS is intentional, as they can be filed individually. Regarding the TAN field appearing twice, it might be better to display separate TAN fields for TCS and TDS. Also, it will be nice to have TDS/TCS feature available for demo data. I will also add a demo for TAN.

@eapa-odoo eapa-odoo force-pushed the master-l10n_in-merge-modules-eapa branch 3 times, most recently from 16b6c96 to 6b380ad Compare December 16, 2024 06:30
@eapa-odoo eapa-odoo changed the title [REF] l10n_in_reports*: merge modules [REF] l10n_in_*: merge modules Dec 16, 2024
@eapa-odoo eapa-odoo force-pushed the master-l10n_in-merge-modules-eapa branch 3 times, most recently from b1d2be8 to a7bd8a5 Compare December 17, 2024 12:36
@hupo-odoo hupo-odoo requested review from a team and RicGR98 and removed request for a team December 17, 2024 16:04
@eapa-odoo eapa-odoo force-pushed the master-l10n_in-merge-modules-eapa branch 5 times, most recently from 501b8b8 to 177f8e9 Compare January 27, 2025 05:06
@eapa-odoo eapa-odoo force-pushed the master-l10n_in-merge-modules-eapa branch 2 times, most recently from 7071eb1 to 903f243 Compare January 31, 2025 12:42
@jco-odoo
Copy link
Contributor

@robodoo r+

@eapa-odoo eapa-odoo force-pushed the master-l10n_in-merge-modules-eapa branch from 903f243 to e7216d2 Compare January 31, 2025 14:02
- Merged the following modules into l10n_in:
  - l10n_in_gstin_status
  - l10n_in_withholding

task: 3980324
@eapa-odoo eapa-odoo force-pushed the master-l10n_in-merge-modules-eapa branch from e7216d2 to 8d0007e Compare January 31, 2025 14:07
@jco-odoo
Copy link
Contributor

@robodoo r+

robodoo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2025
- Merged the following modules into l10n_in:
  - l10n_in_gstin_status
  - l10n_in_withholding

closes #190265

Task: 3980324
Related: odoo/enterprise#75451
Related: odoo/upgrade#6931
Signed-off-by: Josse Colpaert (jco) <jco@odoo.com>
@robodoo robodoo added the 18.2 label Jan 31, 2025
@robodoo robodoo closed this Jan 31, 2025
eapa-odoo added a commit to odoo/documentation that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
Revise the India localization documentation to ensure it aligns with the updated
functionality in the master branch.

ref: odoo/odoo#190265
eapa-odoo added a commit to odoo/documentation that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
Revise the India localization documentation to ensure it aligns with the updated
functionality in the master branch.

ref: odoo/odoo#190265
@fw-bot fw-bot deleted the master-l10n_in-merge-modules-eapa branch February 14, 2025 17:51
eapa-odoo added a commit to odoo/documentation that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2025
Revise the India localization documentation to ensure it aligns with the updated
functionality in the master branch.

ref: odoo/odoo#190265
eapa-odoo added a commit to odoo/documentation that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2025
Revise the India localization documentation to ensure it aligns with the updated
functionality in the master branch.

ref: odoo/odoo#190265
eapa-odoo added a commit to odoo/documentation that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
Revise the India localization documentation to ensure it aligns with the updated
functionality in the master branch.

ref: odoo/odoo#190265
robodoo pushed a commit to odoo/documentation that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
Revise the India localization documentation to ensure it aligns with the updated
functionality in the master branch.

closes #12058

Ref: odoo/odoo#190265
Signed-off-by: Audrey Vandromme (auva) <auva@odoo.com>
shka-odoo added a commit to odoo-dev/odoo that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2025
This error occurs when a user selects `Fiscal Country` to `India` and attempts
to configure any `Indian Integration`.

Steps to reproduce :
1. Install module `l10n_in`.
2. Create a new company `without assigning a country` and switch on it.
3. In Accounting settings :
  - Set Fiscal Country to India and Save.
  - Enable Registered Under GST, enter the GST Number, and Save.

ValueError: External ID not found in the system: account.1_sgst_group.

This error occurs when the `Fiscal Country` is set to `India` and due to recent
merge in module  at [1] allows users to fill in sgst_group even when the
`Fiscal Localization Package is not set`. As a result, the system cannot find
the required sgst_groupID, which is created dynamically when the Fiscal
Localization Package is set to India.

This commit ensures that if the id does not exist, the function will return
None instead of raising an exception.

Link [1] : odoo#190265

sentry: 6362946694
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

18.2 RD research & development, internal work

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants