-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
feat: Add FLAGD_SYNC_PORT support for in-process providers with backwards compatibility #1651
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat: Add FLAGD_SYNC_PORT support for in-process providers with backwards compatibility #1651
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @carla-was-not-available, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the configuration flexibility for flagd in-process providers by introducing a dedicated environment variable, Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
…pen-feature#1619 Signed-off-by: Carla Köberl <carla.freitas.92@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Carla Köberl <carla.freitas.92@hotmail.com>
ac266a8 to
e0e2113
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces support for the FLAGD_SYNC_PORT environment variable for in-process providers, ensuring backward compatibility with FLAGD_PORT. The implementation is correct, and the addition of tests is appreciated. I've provided a few suggestions to enhance the code's readability and improve test coverage for edge cases. Specifically, I've recommended refactoring the port resolution logic in FlagdOptions.java to make it cleaner and more maintainable. In FlagdOptionsTest.java, I've suggested using constants for environment variable keys and adding a test case to verify the precedence of FLAGD_SYNC_PORT over FLAGD_PORT.
providers/flagd/src/main/java/dev/openfeature/contrib/providers/flagd/FlagdOptions.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
providers/flagd/src/test/java/dev/openfeature/contrib/providers/flagd/FlagdOptionsTest.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
providers/flagd/src/test/java/dev/openfeature/contrib/providers/flagd/FlagdOptionsTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
providers/flagd/src/test/java/dev/openfeature/contrib/providers/flagd/FlagdOptionsTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…feature#1651 Signed-off-by: Carla Köberl <carla.freitas.92@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Carla Köberl <carla.freitas.92@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Schrottner <simon.schrottner@dynatrace.com>
aepfli
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code changes look really great, but i think the readme.md needs some update too, as it is not 100% accurate now
This PR
Related Issues
Fixes #1234523
Notes
Follow-up Tasks
How to test
resolves: #1619