fix: correct MultiProvider class name in docs and remove duplicate error logging

[jonathannorris]

Addresses feedback from #1265 (Gemini bot review comments).

Changes

1. Fixed documentation mismatch: Updated all code examples to use MultiProvider instead of incorrect WebMultiProvider class name

   • packages/web/README.md (4 occurrences)
   • packages/web/src/provider/multi-provider/README.md (4 occurrences)

2. Removed duplicate error logging: Fixed redundant stack trace logging in hook-executor.ts where errors were being logged twice in both errorHooks and finallyHooks methods

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @jonathannorris, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses feedback from a previous review by correcting documentation inaccuracies and optimizing error logging. It updates code examples in the web package's READMEs to use the correct MultiProvider class name, resolving potential developer confusion. Additionally, it removes duplicate stack trace logging in the hook-executor.ts file, reducing log noise and improving clarity when errors occur.

Highlights

• Documentation Correction: Updated all code examples in packages/web/README.md and packages/web/src/provider/multi-provider/README.md to correctly reference MultiProvider instead of the outdated WebMultiProvider class name.
• Duplicate Error Logging Removal: Eliminated redundant stack trace logging in hook-executor.ts within both errorHooks and finallyHooks methods, preventing errors from being logged twice.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly updates the documentation to use the MultiProvider class name and removes redundant error logging. My review includes suggestions to make the error logging more robust by adding a check to ensure err.stack exists before passing it to the logger, as it can be undefined.