Skip to content

Conversation

@jonathannorris
Copy link
Member

  • update copyright to OpenFeature Maintainers

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Norris <jonathan@taplytics.com>
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @jonathannorris, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request standardizes the copyright attribution within the project's license file. The change ensures that the intellectual property is correctly assigned to the OpenFeature Maintainers, reflecting current project governance and legal alignment.

Highlights

  • Copyright Update: The copyright notice within the project's LICENSE file has been updated to explicitly state "OpenFeature Maintainers" as the copyright holder.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the copyright holder in the LICENSE file to 'OpenFeature Maintainers'. The change is straightforward, but it appears the copyright year has been omitted from the notice. I've added a comment suggesting that the year be included, as is standard practice for copyright notices.

identification within third-party archives.

Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
Copyright OpenFeature Maintainers

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The copyright year seems to be missing. It's standard practice to include the year of creation (or a range of years) in a copyright notice. The original placeholder [yyyy] was removed but not replaced. For legal clarity and correctness, please consider re-adding the year.

   Copyright [yyyy] OpenFeature Maintainers

@jonathannorris jonathannorris requested review from a team November 19, 2025 15:29
@beeme1mr beeme1mr merged commit da47e54 into main Nov 19, 2025
6 checks passed
@jonathannorris jonathannorris deleted the chore-update-license-copyright branch November 19, 2025 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants