compartment sets 2: reports

[cattabiani]

I was not aware that the parsing and validation of simulation_config.json was done by sonata too. This is also needed to implement fully compartment sets.

The change is based on this proposal openbraininstitute/sonata-extension#5
Final version: https://sonata-extension.readthedocs.io/en/latest/sonata_report.html#fine-grained-compartment-report

• new Report::Type::compartment_set: this disallows and (sets to invalid in the final product) the sections and compartments lines since they lose meaning if we use the compartment_sets.json file.
• add a new compartment_sets report in simulation_config.json for testing.
• add 2 tests to verify that we throw an error if sections or compartments are present
• add new entry in Report to specify which compartment_set we want to use
• order by gid (preserving the list ordering otherwise)

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 15759951865

Details

• 33 of 33 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.08%) to 92.674%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 15489935130:	0.08%
Covered Lines:	2353
Relevant Lines:	2539

---

💛 - Coveralls

[mgeplf]

I'll review it after the sonata-extension is merged.

[cattabiani]

waiting for this to be merged:

openbraininstitute/sonata-extension#5

I have got a working solution already (from beginning to end) with an unfinished version of the nomenclature. I will wait now for the definitive decision on the spec