feat: [FC-0099] allow deleting user's roles

[bra-i-am]

Warning

This PR depends on #6 because it manages the users' roles view

This pull request allows deleting users' roles from the users' roles view

Evidence

Screencast.from.15-10-25.17.53.05.webm

Testing instructions

1. Create and set up a local environment (Tutor recommended)
2. Run LMS and CMS, then clone the repo in the current branch and run the dev server npm run dev
3. Add the URL to the CORS_WHITELIST in both LMS/CMS settings.py

# admin console MFE
CORS_ORIGIN_WHITELIST.append("http://apps.local.openedx.io:2025")
LOGIN_REDIRECT_WHITELIST.append("apps.local.openedx.io:2025")
CSRF_TRUSTED_ORIGINS.append("http://apps.local.openedx.io:2025")

4. Go to the Studio and create a library
5. Navigate to http://apps.local.openedx.io:2025/admin-console/authz/libraries/< your_library_id >
6. Install the plugin https://github.com/openedx/openedx-authz by running tutor dev exec lms pip install git+https://github.com/openedx/openedx-authz
7. Run the migrations tutor dev exec lms python manage.py lms migrate openedx_authz
8. Load the default policies by running tutor dev exec lms python manage.py lms load_policies
9. Go to http://local.openedx.io:8000/api-docs/#/authz/authz_v1_roles_users_update and add a role to any user different from the logged-in one, following the structure

{
  "role": "library_author", // Create another with "library_admin" to be able to filter
  "scope": "lib:OpenedX:testlib", // Id of the previously created library
  "users": [
    "admin"
    // more usernames or emails if wanted
  ]
}

10. Navigate to http://apps.local.openedx.io:2025/admin-console/authz/libraries/< your_library_id >
11. Click the Edit button at the end of the user row
12. Click the button Add New Role, fill the form, and click save
13. Repeat the previous step to have a user with a minimum of 2 assigned roles
14. Now, click the trash icon of any of the previously assigned roles; you should see a proper toast
15. Remove all the assigned roles by clicking the trash icons; you should see a proper toast

Additional Information

openedx/openedx-authz#45

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @bra-i-am!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/committers-frontend.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

• If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
  • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
• If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

• Dependencies

  This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

• Blockers

  This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

• Timeline information

  This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

• Partner information

  This is for a course on edx.org.

• Supporting documentation
• Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

---

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

• Overview of Review Process for Community Contributions
• Pull Request Status Guide
• Making changes to your pull request

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

• The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
• The need for product review
• Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

[dcoa]

use the logger for frontend-platform instead

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 97.87234% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.86%. Comparing base (50beaef) to head (de47612).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...-module/libraries-manager/LibrariesUserManager.tsx	95.45%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #13      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.66%   93.86%   +0.20%     
==========================================
  Files          41       43       +2     
  Lines         710      799      +89     
  Branches      147      145       -2     
==========================================
+ Hits          665      750      +85     
- Misses         42       46       +4     
  Partials        3        3              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[jacobo-dominguez-wgu]

Tested on the sandbox and roles is correctly deleted, just a minor comment but it LGTM!

[jacobo-dominguez-wgu]

The alt should be an intl messsage.

[arbrandes]

The feature works and the code is mostly fine, thank you!

I would like to see us avoid getByTestId unless there's no other way, though. Also, there's that alt that requires internationalization.

[arbrandes]

Can we please avoid getByTestId wherever possible? (See the docs.)

[dcoa]

@arbrandes I addressed the comments

[arbrandes]

Thank for addressing the review!