-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8303511: C2: assert(get_ctrl(n) == cle_out) during unrolling #12824
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back roland! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Webrevs
|
vnkozlov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this looks good.
|
@rwestrel This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 66 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/loopstripmining/TestAddPAtOuterLoopHead.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…pHead.java Co-authored-by: Andrey Turbanov <turbanoff@gmail.com>
TobiHartmann
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
|
@vnkozlov @TobiHartmann thanks for the reviews! |
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit 3f2d929.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
In the same round of loop optimizations:
PhaseIdealLoop::remix_address_expressions()creates a newAddPout of loop. It sets it control to
n_loop->_head->in(LoopNode::EntryControl)which, because the loop isstrip mined, is an
OuterStripMinedLoop.The
LoadIfor thatAddPis found to only have uses outside theloop and is cloned out of the loop. It's referenced by the outer
loop's safepoint.
The loop is unrolled. Unrolling follows the safepoint's inputs and
find the new
AddPwith control set to theOuterStripMinedLoopand the assert fires.
No control should be set to an
OuterStripMinedLoop. The fix isstraightforward and sets the control to the
OuterStripMinedLoopentry control.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12824/head:pull/12824$ git checkout pull/12824Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12824$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12824/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12824View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12824Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12824.diff