-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8304696: Duplicate class names in dynamicArchive tests can lead to test failure #13542
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8304696: Duplicate class names in dynamicArchive tests can lead to test failure #13542
Conversation
|
/label add hotspot-runtime |
|
👋 Welcome back ccheung! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@calvinccheung |
Webrevs
|
|
I think it's better to restructure the test classes to avoid having the same problem in the future -- classes with generic names that appear in multiple, unrelated test cases. In this particular case, we have both LinkClassApp.java and LambdaProxyDuringShutdownApp.java that contain two different implementation of a class with the same name, MyShutdown. I would suggest putting the small, generic classes as static inner classes. E.g., Then, the test cases can refer to this class using a unique name, like LinkClassApp.java (and perhaps some more test classes) should also be restructured similarly. Thanks |
|
I've made changes to the LinkClassTest.java and LinkClassApp.java as you suggested. So I reverted the changes to my original webrev. |
iklam
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
|
@calvinccheung This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 57 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
Thanks @iklam for the review. |
|
Going to push as commit b2240bf.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@calvinccheung Pushed as commit b2240bf. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
To avoid duplicate class name
MyShutdown, the fix is to change theMyShutdownclass name for the LambdaProxyDuringShutdown.java test toShutdownHelper.Tested manually by running the LInkClassTest.java and LambdaProxyDuringShutdown.java tests serially on linux-x64.
Also ran tiers 1 and 3 testing.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13542/head:pull/13542$ git checkout pull/13542Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13542$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13542/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13542View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13542Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13542.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment