-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8339313: 32-bit build broken #22707
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8339313: 32-bit build broken #22707
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back stuefe! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@tstuefe This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 10 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@tstuefe The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
coleenp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems reasonable.
SoniaZaldana
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not a Reviewer but this makes sense to me.
|
Thank you all. |
|
Going to push as commit e9ad27f.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Two fixes to fix the 32-bit build.
See JBS issue and code comment for details.
I ran nNoClassDefFoundErrorTest x64 and x86 fastdebug and release. On fastdebug, the giant string test now gets silently skipped as expected.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22707/head:pull/22707$ git checkout pull/22707Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22707$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22707/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22707View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22707Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22707.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment