Skip to content

Conversation

@iklam
Copy link
Member

@iklam iklam commented Mar 31, 2025

The failure happens because java/lang/invoke/VarHandleGuards is missing from the list of AOT-initialized classes. Please see the JBS issue for details.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8352768: CDS test MethodHandleTest.java failed in -Xcomp mode (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24321/head:pull/24321
$ git checkout pull/24321

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24321
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24321/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24321

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24321

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24321.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@iklam iklam marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2025 05:15
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 31, 2025

👋 Welcome back iklam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 31, 2025

@iklam This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8352768: CDS test MethodHandleTest.java failed in -Xcomp mode

Reviewed-by: dholmes, shade, vlivanov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 31 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e4e6278: 8346129: Simplify EdDSA & XDH curve name usage
  • 7a2e198: 8352277: java.security documentation: incorrect regex syntax describing "usage" algorithm constraint
  • b7ca76e: 8353235: Test jdk/jfr/api/metadata/annotations/TestPeriod.java fails with IllegalArgumentException
  • bbd5b17: 8339280: jarsigner -verify performs cross-checking between CEN and LOC
  • d4d1835: 8352860: Open source events tests batch0
  • c9c3c15: 8330598: java/net/httpclient/Http1ChunkedTest.java fails with java.util.MissingFormatArgumentException: Format specifier '%s'
  • 804a8fa: 8352765: G1CollectedHeap::expand_and_allocate() may fail to allocate even after heap expansion succeeds
  • 22f630c: 8352415: x86: Tighten up template interpreter method entry code
  • 6fbaa06: 8353176: C1: x86 patching stub always calls Thread::current()
  • 79d0c94: 8352114: New test runtime/interpreter/CountBytecodesTest.java is failing
  • ... and 21 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/58ef4015b7313292a7c7634d3e00e3a904bbdc50...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 31, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 31, 2025

@iklam The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Mar 31, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay - seems trivial. Ship it!

Thanks

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 31, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@iwanowww iwanowww left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@iklam
Copy link
Member Author

iklam commented Mar 31, 2025

Thanks @dholmes-ora @shipilev @iwanowww for the review
/integraye

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 31, 2025

@iklam Unknown command integraye - for a list of valid commands use /help.

@iklam
Copy link
Member Author

iklam commented Mar 31, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Going to push as commit 5eee32d.
Since your change was applied there have been 38 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8b0602d: 8319447: Improve performance of delayed task handling
  • fe8bd75: 8351290: Clarify integral only for vector operators
  • 4d1de46: 8352185: Shenandoah: Invalid logic for remembered set verification
  • 3e96f5c: 8351366: Remove the java.security.debug=scl option
  • 4247744: 8351435: Change the default Console implementation back to the built-in one in java.base module
  • 9c06dcb: 8349583: Add mechanism to disable signature schemes based on their TLS scope
  • cd5a43a: 8353126: Open source events tests batch1
  • e4e6278: 8346129: Simplify EdDSA & XDH curve name usage
  • 7a2e198: 8352277: java.security documentation: incorrect regex syntax describing "usage" algorithm constraint
  • b7ca76e: 8353235: Test jdk/jfr/api/metadata/annotations/TestPeriod.java fails with IllegalArgumentException
  • ... and 28 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/58ef4015b7313292a7c7634d3e00e3a904bbdc50...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 31, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 31, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 31, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 31, 2025

@iklam Pushed as commit 5eee32d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants