Skip to content

Conversation

@iklam
Copy link
Member

@iklam iklam commented Apr 17, 2025

The assert in Klass::remove_java_mirror() is too narrow. When creating the AOT cache, it's possible to see two types of Klasses that do not have a Java mirror:

  • Unregistered classes (a cached class to be loaded by a custom class loader in the production run)
  • An array type of an unregistered class

I have relaxed the assert to accept both conditions


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8353298: AOT cache creation asserts with _array_klasses in an unregistered InstanceKlass (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24711/head:pull/24711
$ git checkout pull/24711

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24711
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24711/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24711

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24711

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24711.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 17, 2025

👋 Welcome back iklam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 17, 2025

@iklam This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8353298: AOT cache creation asserts with _array_klasses in an unregistered InstanceKlass

Reviewed-by: ccheung, kvn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 82 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 17, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 17, 2025

@iklam The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 17, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 17, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@calvinccheung calvinccheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Can you add some comment in the test on what it is testing?

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 17, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 18, 2025
@iklam
Copy link
Member Author

iklam commented Apr 18, 2025

Looks good. Can you add some comment in the test on what it is testing?

I added a @summary section in the test. I intend to add more test cases to this file (e.g., JDK-8354557). That's why I made the name of the test, AOTCacheSupportForCustomLoaders, rather generic.

Copy link
Member

@calvinccheung calvinccheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good.

@iklam
Copy link
Member Author

iklam commented Apr 23, 2025

Thanks @vnkozlov and @calvinccheung for the review
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Going to push as commit 88e0b00.
Since your change was applied there have been 119 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 23, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 23, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 23, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 23, 2025

@iklam Pushed as commit 88e0b00.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants