-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8358105: RISC-V: Optimize interpreter profile updates #25520
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8358105: RISC-V: Optimize interpreter profile updates #25520
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back wenanjian! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@Anjian-Wen This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 121 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@feilongjiang, @RealFYang) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
|
@Anjian-Wen The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
|
/issue JDK-8358105 |
|
@Anjian-Wen The primary solved issue for a PR is set through the PR title. Since the current title does not contain an issue reference, it will now be updated. |
feilongjiang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
RealFYang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. My local tier1-2 test on linux-riscv64 is clean.
|
@feilongjiang @RealFYang Thanks for your review and comments! |
|
/integrate |
|
@Anjian-Wen |
|
/sponsor |
|
Going to push as commit 939521b.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@feilongjiang @Anjian-Wen Pushed as commit 939521b. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
The reason of this patch is same as the x86 and aarch64 but for riscv
JDK-8356946
JDK-8357223
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25520/head:pull/25520$ git checkout pull/25520Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25520$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25520/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25520View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25520Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25520.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment