Skip to content

Conversation

@alexeysemenyukoracle
Copy link
Member

@alexeysemenyukoracle alexeysemenyukoracle commented Oct 31, 2025

  • Fix MacPackagingPipeline.
  • Fix AppImageSigner: this is the follow-up for MacPackagingPipeline fix. Without fixing AppImageSigner AppImagePackageTest.testEmpty test fails. It happened that the test passed because jpackage wrongly created the plist file for the embedded runtime in the case of the predefined app image. The test passed because of the bug in jpackage fixed in this PR.
  • Add test cases for predefined app image packaging to the CustomInfoPListTest test. They had been failing before MacPackagingPipeline was fixed.

Supplementary changes:

  • Get rid of duplicated createInputRuntimeImage() and createRuntimeBundle() functions.
  • Improve MacHelper.writeFaPListFragment() to work with a predefined app image.
  • Add optional tracing to the packaging pipeline (turned off by default, must edit static fields to enable in custom builds).
  • PListReader: add find methods that return an Optional instead of throwing an exception when the requested key is not found; update unit tests.

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Warning

 ⚠️ Found leading lowercase letter in issue title for 8371076: jpackage will wrongly overwrite the plist file in the embedded runtime when executed with the "--app-image" option

Issue

  • JDK-8371076: jpackage will wrongly overwrite the plist file in the embedded runtime when executed with the "--app-image" option (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28089/head:pull/28089
$ git checkout pull/28089

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28089
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28089/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28089

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28089

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28089.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

…wing an exception when the requested key is not found; add toXmlConsumer(); update unit tests.
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 31, 2025

👋 Welcome back asemenyuk! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 31, 2025

@alexeysemenyukoracle This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8371076: jpackage will wrongly overwrite the plist file in the embedded runtime when executed with the "--app-image" option

Reviewed-by: almatvee

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 72 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 31, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 31, 2025

@alexeysemenyukoracle The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@alexeysemenyukoracle alexeysemenyukoracle changed the title Fix MacPackagingPipeline to not create the plist file for the embedded runtime when building a package from the predefined app image Fix MacPackagingPipeline to not overwrite the plist file for the embedded runtime when building a package from the predefined app image Oct 31, 2025
@alexeysemenyukoracle alexeysemenyukoracle changed the title Fix MacPackagingPipeline to not overwrite the plist file for the embedded runtime when building a package from the predefined app image Fix MacPackagingPipeline to not overwrite the plist file of the embedded runtime when building a package from the predefined app image Oct 31, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 31, 2025

@alexeysemenyukoracle Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information.

…the embedded runtime when bundling predefined app image; AppImageSigner: should not attempt to sign embedded runtime bundle if it is not valid (missing). AppImagePackageTest.testEmpty test fails unless AppImageSigner is fixed.
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 31, 2025

@alexeysemenyukoracle Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information.

@alexeysemenyukoracle alexeysemenyukoracle changed the title Fix MacPackagingPipeline to not overwrite the plist file of the embedded runtime when building a package from the predefined app image 8371076: jpackage will wrongly overwrite the plist file in the embedded runtime when executed with the "--app-image" option Oct 31, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 31, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Webrevs

@alexeysemenyukoracle
Copy link
Member Author

@sashamatveev PTAL

return findNode(keyName).filter(node -> {
switch (node.getNodeName()) {
case "true", "false" -> {
return true;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confused. Looks like this code will return true even if value is false. You can use return Boolean.parseBoolean(node.getNodeName()). No need for switch in this case.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like this code will return true even if value is false

Correct. This code filters the node by its name. If the name is true or false, it accepts it and pass further, otherwise it returns false and the function returns an empty Optional.

Copy link
Member

@sashamatveev sashamatveev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good with minor comments.


import java.util.Objects;

public final class Slot<T> {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add comment to explain why we need this class and how it is used?

Copy link
Member

@sashamatveev sashamatveev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 1, 2025
@alexeysemenyukoracle
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 2, 2025

Going to push as commit 7c900da.
Since your change was applied there have been 74 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 2, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 2, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 2, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 2, 2025

@alexeysemenyukoracle Pushed as commit 7c900da.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants