Skip to content

Conversation

@nsjian
Copy link

@nsjian nsjian commented Mar 17, 2022

Vector API long to float conversion operation on NEON converts vector of 2 longs to 2 floats. In current implementation, we convert 2 longs to 2 doubles first and then converts 2 doubles to 2 floats. However, this two-steps conversion may have two roundings, while the expected behavior, conversion from long to float directly, has only one rounding. This will result in inconsistent result. E.g. for the failure test case:

jshell> long l = 0x561a524000000001L;
l ==> 6204361871487664129

jshell> float l2f = (float)l;
l2f ==> 6.2043621E18

jshell> float l2d2f = (float)((double)l);
l2d2f ==> 6.2043616E18

Since we don't have NEON instruction to support vector long to float conversion, we fix the codegen by doing it in scalar operation one element by one element.

TEST: vector api jtreg tests passed.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8282764: AArch64: compiler/vectorapi/reshape/TestVectorCastNeon.java failed with incorrect result

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7850/head:pull/7850
$ git checkout pull/7850

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/7850
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7850/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 7850

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 7850

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7850.diff

…failed with incorrect result

Vector API long to float conversion operation on NEON converts vector
of 2 longs to 2 floats. In current implementation, we convert 2 longs
to 2 doubles first and then converts 2 doubles to 2 floats. However,
this two-steps conversion may have two roundings, while the expected
behavior, conversion from long to float directly, has only one
rounding. This will result in inconsistent result. E.g. for the
failure test case:

```
jshell> long l = 0x561a524000000001L;
l ==> 6204361871487664129

jshell> float l2f = (float)l;
l2f ==> 6.2043621E18

jshell> float l2d2f = (float)((double)l);
l2d2f ==> 6.2043616E18
```

Since we don't have NEON instruction to support vector long to float
conversion, we fix the codegen by doing it in scalar operation one
element by one element.

TEST: vector api jtreg tests passed.
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 17, 2022

👋 Welcome back njian! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 17, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 17, 2022

@nsjian The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Mar 17, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 17, 2022

Webrevs

@e1iu
Copy link
Member

e1iu commented Mar 23, 2022

Looks good to me (not a reviewer).

@nsjian
Copy link
Author

nsjian commented Mar 23, 2022

Looks good to me (not a reviewer).

Thank you @theRealELiu !

0,
Long.MAX_VALUE,
Long.MIN_VALUE,
0x561a524000000001L,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A comment would be useful as to why this constant is important

Copy link
Member

@PaulSandoz PaulSandoz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for updating the copyright year. Java changes look good. Just one comment related to an additional value added for testing.

@nsjian
Copy link
Author

nsjian commented Mar 29, 2022

Thanks for updating the copyright year. Java changes look good. Just one comment related to an additional value added for testing.

Thank you for the review @PaulSandoz ! Code comment added.

Copy link
Member

@PaulSandoz PaulSandoz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Java changes are good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 29, 2022

@nsjian This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8282764: AArch64: compiler/vectorapi/reshape/TestVectorCastNeon.java failed with incorrect result

Reviewed-by: psandoz, ngasson, eliu

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 168 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b82b009: 8283737: riscv: MacroAssembler::stop() should emit fixed-length instruction sequence
  • edb42d7: 8282547: IGV: add control-flow graph view
  • 7418373: 8283788: Remove unused VM_DeoptimizeAll::_dependee
  • aa33525: 8283787: C1: Remove unused ArrayStoreExceptionStub::_info
  • 8b65611: 8283789: CompilerPhaseTypeHelper::to_bitmask should operate on uint64_t
  • 9bb916d: 8283800: Simplify String.indexOf/lastIndexOf calls
  • b323f54: 8283846: Remove unused jdk.internal.reflect.SignatureIterator
  • eb5b712: 8283701: Add final or sealed modifier to appropriate java.awt.color ICC_Profile API classes
  • d066856: 8282162: [vector] Optimize integral vector negation API
  • bfd9c2b: 8283015: Create a test for JDK-4715496
  • ... and 158 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/de4f04cb71a26ce03b96460cb8d1c1e28cd1ed38...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 29, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@nick-arm nick-arm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cpu/aarch64 changes look OK to me and the Windows x64 failure is some unrelated environment setup problem.

@nsjian
Copy link
Author

nsjian commented Mar 30, 2022

Thanks for the review! @nick-arm

/reviewer credit @theRealELiu

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 30, 2022

@nsjian
Reviewer eliu successfully credited.

@nsjian
Copy link
Author

nsjian commented Mar 30, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 30, 2022

Going to push as commit 51c05e8.
Since your change was applied there have been 168 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b82b009: 8283737: riscv: MacroAssembler::stop() should emit fixed-length instruction sequence
  • edb42d7: 8282547: IGV: add control-flow graph view
  • 7418373: 8283788: Remove unused VM_DeoptimizeAll::_dependee
  • aa33525: 8283787: C1: Remove unused ArrayStoreExceptionStub::_info
  • 8b65611: 8283789: CompilerPhaseTypeHelper::to_bitmask should operate on uint64_t
  • 9bb916d: 8283800: Simplify String.indexOf/lastIndexOf calls
  • b323f54: 8283846: Remove unused jdk.internal.reflect.SignatureIterator
  • eb5b712: 8283701: Add final or sealed modifier to appropriate java.awt.color ICC_Profile API classes
  • d066856: 8282162: [vector] Optimize integral vector negation API
  • bfd9c2b: 8283015: Create a test for JDK-4715496
  • ... and 158 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/de4f04cb71a26ce03b96460cb8d1c1e28cd1ed38...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 30, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 30, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 30, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 30, 2022

@nsjian Pushed as commit 51c05e8.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants