Skip to content

Conversation

@Rudometov
Copy link
Member

@Rudometov Rudometov commented Sep 27, 2022

Backport for JDK-8287076


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8287076: Document.normalizeDocument() produces different results

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev pull/738/head:pull/738
$ git checkout pull/738

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/738
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev pull/738/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 738

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 738

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/738.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 27, 2022

👋 Welcome back vrudomet! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 1f9521e6cb2f701f8712b4ec941ff1dbb45dad4e 8287076: Document.normalizeDocument() produces different results Sep 27, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 27, 2022

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 27, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 27, 2022

Webrevs

@Rudometov Rudometov closed this Sep 27, 2022
@Rudometov Rudometov deleted the Backport-JDK-8287076 branch September 27, 2022 03:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant