Bug 1862367: fixed application namespace filtering

[vimalk78]

Earlier implementation of application namespace filtering was based on selectively scrapping logs for namespaces in CLF spec.inputs.application.namespaces
CLF approach is to scrape all container logs, and then generate fluent conf according to the CLF spec.pipeline.
Now if namespaces are specified in spec.inputs.application, then filter is used to send only the namespace logs to pipeline.

The logic for dispatching application logs is:

if .CollectAppLogs
  if .AppNamespace
    <match $ns>  // tags for namespace only
      @type relabel
      @label @_APPLICATION
    </match>
  else
    <match k8s.**>
      @type relabel
      @label @_APPLICATION
    </match>      
  fi
else
    <match k8s.**>
      @null
    </match>
fi

/cc @alanconway @jcantrill

[openshift-ci-robot]

@vimalk78: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1862367, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
• bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1862367: fixed application namespace filtering

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@vimalk78: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1862367, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1862367: fixed application namespace filtering

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@vimalk78: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1862367, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1862367: fixed application namespace filtering

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@vimalk78: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1862367, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1862367: fixed application namespace filtering

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@vimalk78: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1862367, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1862367: fixed application namespace filtering

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[alanconway]

/approve
/lgtm

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alanconway, vimalk78

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [alanconway]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

@vimalk78: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/cluster-logging-operator#675

Bugzilla bug 1862367 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1862367: fixed application namespace filtering

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.