Skip to content

Conversation

@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor

this pr should not be merged and is intended for testing.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 29, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 29, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ricardomaraschini
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign bparees for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ricardomaraschini ricardomaraschini force-pushed the temp-remove-finalizers-4.16 branch 3 times, most recently from e4b9557 to 9b050c0 Compare April 30, 2025 11:27
Copy link
Contributor

@sanchezl sanchezl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On the right track, but this would still leave the possibility of some token secrets being missed if the SA->ImagePullSecret->TokenSecret connections are not there. Consider bringing in the legacyImagePullSecretRollbackController into the OCM-o and running it in parallel.

Comment on lines +68 to +71
// once the image registry is disabled we want to wait unil the controller manager
// operand is deployed and stable before clean up the image pull secrets. we don't
// want to compete with the operand that may be acting on the same resources we are.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is still a chance for the controllers to be out of sync here, but I do think that this is an improvement.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ricardomaraschini ricardomaraschini May 1, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please elaborate a little bit more on the legacyImagePullSecretRollbackController matter ? It does not seem to be in use in the openshift-controller-manager project (I could not find where it is started there).

I failed to see how the controllers could be out of sync, can you give me more details ?

this pr should not be merged and is intended for testing.
@ricardomaraschini ricardomaraschini force-pushed the temp-remove-finalizers-4.16 branch from 9b050c0 to 40a6d88 Compare May 1, 2025 06:58
@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor Author

This one is being superseded by #382

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants