Skip to content

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #170

/assign jgbernalp

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Bernal <gbernal@redhat.com>
@jgbernalp
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 17, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 17, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jgbernalp, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 17, 2025
@jgbernalp
Copy link
Contributor

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Oct 17, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 17, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #170

/assign jgbernalp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jgbernalp jgbernalp changed the title [release-1.0] NO-JIRA: fix: makefile to allow dev depencies while building NO-JIRA: [release-1.0] fix: makefile to allow dev depencies while building Oct 17, 2025
@zhuje
Copy link
Contributor

zhuje commented Oct 17, 2025

/retest

@andreasgerstmayr
Copy link
Contributor

/label ux-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the ux-approved Signifies that UX has signed off on this PR label Oct 17, 2025
@jgbernalp
Copy link
Contributor

/retest upstream-amd64-aws-e2e

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 17, 2025

@jgbernalp: The /retest command does not accept any targets.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test upstream-amd64-aws-e2e
/test upstream-amd64-aws-fips-image-scan
/test upstream-amd64-aws-images
/test upstream-amd64-aws-lint

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/retest upstream-amd64-aws-e2e

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jgbernalp
Copy link
Contributor

/test upstream-amd64-aws-e2e

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD c308b4d and 2 for PR HEAD 6e3e9cd in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 17, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit f609201 into openshift:release-1.0 Oct 17, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR ux-approved Signifies that UX has signed off on this PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants