OCPBUGS-65586: Update the RHCOS 4.20 bootimage metadata to 9.6.202511…

[tlbueno]

The changes done here will update the RHCOS 4.20 bootimage metadata and
address the following issues:

OCPBUGS-64611: [4.20] [OCP 4.18] coreos-boot-disk link not working with
multipath on early boot

This change was generated using:

plume cosa2stream \
    --target data/data/coreos/rhcos.json \
    --distro rhcos \
    --no-signatures \
    --name rhel-9.6 \
    --url https://rhcos.mirror.openshift.com/art/storage/prod/streams \
    x86_64=9.6.20251113-0        \
    aarch64=9.6.20251113-0       \
    s390x=9.6.20251113-0         \
    ppc64le=9.6.20251113-0

[openshift-ci-robot]

@tlbueno: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65586, which is invalid:

• release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65585 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

The changes done here will update the RHCOS 4.20 bootimage metadata and
address the following issues:

OCPBUGS-64611: [4.20] [OCP 4.18] coreos-boot-disk link not working with
multipath on early boot

This change was generated using:

plume cosa2stream \
   --target data/data/coreos/rhcos.json \
   --distro rhcos \
   --no-signatures \
   --name rhel-9.6 \
   --url https://rhcos.mirror.openshift.com/art/storage/prod/streams \
   x86_64=9.6.20251113-0        \
   aarch64=9.6.20251113-0       \
   s390x=9.6.20251113-0         \
   ppc64le=9.6.20251113-0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[yasminvalim]

/lgtm

[tlbueno]

/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

[marmijo]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: marmijo, yasminvalim

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• data/data/coreos/OWNERS [marmijo,yasminvalim]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@tlbueno: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[sdodson]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@sdodson: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65586, which is invalid:

• release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65585 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[sdodson]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@sdodson: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65586, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65585 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[sdodson]

/label backport-risk-assessed
/verified by CI

[openshift-ci-robot]

@sdodson: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

/label backport-risk-assessed
/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[sdodson]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@sdodson: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65586, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.20.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.z)
• bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
• release note text is set and does not match the template
• dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65585 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
• dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65585 targets the "4.21.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.21.0
• bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mike-nguyen

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@tlbueno: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65586
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65586 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

The changes done here will update the RHCOS 4.20 bootimage metadata and
address the following issues:

OCPBUGS-64611: [4.20] [OCP 4.18] coreos-boot-disk link not working with
multipath on early boot

This change was generated using:

plume cosa2stream \
   --target data/data/coreos/rhcos.json \
   --distro rhcos \
   --no-signatures \
   --name rhel-9.6 \
   --url https://rhcos.mirror.openshift.com/art/storage/prod/streams \
   x86_64=9.6.20251113-0        \
   aarch64=9.6.20251113-0       \
   s390x=9.6.20251113-0         \
   ppc64le=9.6.20251113-0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.