[release-4.19] OCPBUGS-66999: Use separate tmpfs for ostree checkout on live ISO#10153
Conversation
Installations using ABI/assisted with 16GiB of RAM on the bootstrap node were failing with "no space left on device" during bootstrapping. The live ISO environment uses a tmpfs mounted at /var that is sized at 50% of available RAM. On systems with 16GiB of RAM, this provides only 8GiB of tmpfs space. At the beginning of the bootstrap process, node-image-pull.sh creates an ostree checkout underneath /var/ostree-container. When this is added to the regular disk space usage of the later parts of the bootstrap, the peak tmpfs usage hits around 9.4GiB. This fix creates a separate 4GiB tmpfs for /var/ostree-container, so that it is not subject to the limits on the size of /var.
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66231 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66999. Will retitle bug to link to clone. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66999, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/approve |
|
@zaneb: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66999, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: zaneb The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@zaneb: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/lgtm |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@zaneb: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66999, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
81a8e63
into
openshift:release-4.19
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66999 Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66999 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Fix included in accepted release 4.19.0-0.nightly-2025-12-11-195621 |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #10140
/assign zaneb