Skip to content

Bug 1786314: Bump dependencies#4561

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
shiftstack:bz-1786314
Feb 17, 2021
Merged

Bug 1786314: Bump dependencies#4561
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
shiftstack:bz-1786314

Conversation

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member

  • github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud
  • github.com/gophercloud/utils
  • github.com/terraform-provider-openstack/terraform-provider-openstack

and dependant packages.

/label platform/openstack

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. platform/openstack bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 18, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pierreprinetti: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1786314, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
Details

In response to this:

Bug 1786314: Bump dependencies

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jan 18, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@pierreprinetti pierreprinetti marked this pull request as ready for review January 19, 2021 19:36
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 19, 2021
@pierreprinetti pierreprinetti force-pushed the bz-1786314 branch 2 times, most recently from ecd263f to e30748c Compare January 20, 2021 07:59
Copy link
Contributor

@Fedosin Fedosin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-azure

Copy link
Member

@mandre mandre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 20, 2021
@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @crawford

just as the bot suggests.

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member Author

/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-azure

Copy link
Contributor

@Fedosin Fedosin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@Fedosin
Copy link
Contributor

Fedosin commented Jan 20, 2021

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 20, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 20, 2021
@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member Author

Removed the 1.15 bump. Thanks @Fedosin
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 15, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@staebler
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

This looks like a legitimate failure caused by these changes.

level=fatal msg=failed to fetch Master Machines: failed to load asset "Install Config": failed to create a network client: unable to load secure.yaml: no secure.yml file found

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 16, 2021
@EmilienM
Copy link
Member

EmilienM commented Feb 16, 2021

I think we hit:

https://github.com/gophercloud/utils/blob/f6de111f2eaedc778f842096b07cbc319a7b3cdd/openstack/clientconfig/utils.go#L137-L170

func FindAndReadYAML(yamlFile string) (string, []byte, error) {
(...)
	return "", nil, fmt.Errorf("no %s file found: %w", yamlFile, os.ErrNotExist)
}

so maybe we need to create that file in our CI? Although it sounds backward incompatible change for our users who might not have secure.yaml.

* github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud
* github.com/gophercloud/utils
* github.com/terraform-provider-openstack/terraform-provider-openstack

Also adjust a call to servergroup.List to comply with the new function
signature[1].

[1]: gophercloud/gophercloud#2070

Signed-off-by: Emilien Macchi <emilien@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 16, 2021
@EmilienM
Copy link
Member

/test e2e-openstack

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member

/retest

Copy link
Member

@mandre mandre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 16, 2021
@EmilienM
Copy link
Member

/test e2e-aws-workers-rhel7

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member

/retest

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member

@staebler finally passing CI, any change to approve it please?

Thanks

@staebler
Copy link
Contributor

@staebler finally passing CI, any change to approve it please?

Thanks

This has already been approved. I didn't mean to delay this PR with the hold: I only wanted to keep the tests from retrying.

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 17, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0bc7d5b into openshift:master Feb 17, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pierreprinetti: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Bugzilla bug 1786314 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1786314: Bump dependencies

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. platform/openstack

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants