OCPBUGS-41852: add tested IBMCloud instance types in 4.17 test#8932
OCPBUGS-41852: add tested IBMCloud instance types in 4.17 test#8932openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
Conversation
|
@sadasu could you help review it, thanks a lot |
| * `mx2-8x64` | ||
| * `mx2d-4x32` | ||
| * `mx3d-2x20` | ||
| * `ox2-4x32` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we no longer support these types?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
replace mx3d-2x20 with 'mx3d-4x40 '
replace ox2-4x32 with ox2-8x64
- list one type in the same profiles
- use the larger to support the master and workers.
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sadasu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/test e2e-ibmcloud-ovn |
|
/retest |
|
@MayXuQQ: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@MayXuQQ: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@MayXuQQ: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41852, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
1 similar comment
|
/jira refresh |
|
@MayXuQQ: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41852, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: MayXuQQ. Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@sadasu could you give a lgtm? thanks |
|
/lgtm |
|
@MayXuQQ: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41852: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41852 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-4.17 |
|
@MayXuQQ: new pull request created: #9030 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
add new vm type found in 4.17 test.
OCPBUGS-41852