Skip to content

OCPBUGS-55193: data/manifests/bootkube/cvo-overrides: Default to eus-4.14#9643

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.14from
wking:eus-4.14-default
Apr 28, 2025
Merged

OCPBUGS-55193: data/manifests/bootkube/cvo-overrides: Default to eus-4.14#9643
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.14from
wking:eus-4.14-default

Conversation

@wking
Copy link
Member

@wking wking commented Apr 8, 2025

Like 12e711e (#9373), but for 4.14. Timing on this one has 4.14 leaving the maintenance phase and entering the EUS phase on 2025-05-01. We want 4.14.z that enter fast-4.14 up through that time to keep being added to stable-4.14, but 4.14.z that enter fast-4.14 after that date to only be added to eus-4.14 (and no longer get added to stable-4.14), to help folks who don't meet the EUS qualifications stay on releases that they have support for. Landing this change on 2025-04-28 or so should get us into that position, because 4.14.z built the week of 2025-04-21 through 2025-04-25 would likely be entering fast-4.14 on the week of 2025-04-28 through 2025-05-02.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 8, 2025

@wking: This pull request references OTA-1487 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.14.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Like 12e711e (#9373), but for 4.14. Timing on this one has 4.14 leaving the maintenance phase and entering the EUS phase on 2025-05-01. We want 4.14.z that enter fast-4.14 up through that time to keep being added to stable-4.14, but 4.14.z that enter fast-4.14 after that date to only be added to eus-4.14 (and no longer get added to stable-4.14), to help folks who don't meet the EUS qualifications stay on releases that they have support for. Landing this change on 2025-04-28 or so should get us into that position, because 4.14.z built the week of 2025-04-21 through 2025-04-25 would likely be entering fast-4.14 on the week of 2025-04-28 through 2025-05-02.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Apr 8, 2025

/hold until 2025-04-28, to try to hit the first 4.y.z that could enter fast-4.14 on or after 2025-05-01.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 8, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from patrickdillon and rwsu April 8, 2025 16:19
Like 12e711e (data/manifests/bootkube/cvo-overrides: Default to
eus-4.12, 2025-01-15, openshift#9373), but for 4.14.  Timing on this one has
4.14 leaving the maintenance phase and entering the EUS phase on
2025-05-01 [1].  We want 4.14.z that enter fast-4.14 up through that
time to keep being added to stable-4.14, but 4.14.z that enter
fast-4.14 after that date to only be added to eus-4.14 (and no longer
get added to stable-4.14), to help folks who don't meet the EUS
qualifications stay on releases that they have support for.  Landing
this change on 2025-04-28 or so should get us into that position,
because 4.14.z built the week of 2025-04-21 through 2025-04-25 would
likely be entering fast-4.14 on the week of 2025-04-28 through
2025-05-02.

[1]: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/openshift#dates
@wking wking force-pushed the eus-4.14-default branch from 2eb1a34 to 6ae7f33 Compare April 8, 2025 16:27
@wking wking changed the title OTA-1487: data/manifests/bootkube/cvo-overrides.yaml: Default to eus-4.14 OTA-1487: data/manifests/bootkube/cvo-overrides: Default to eus-4.14 Apr 8, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 8, 2025

@wking: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 6ae7f33 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-static-ovn 6ae7f33 link false /test e2e-vsphere-static-ovn
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-upgrade 6ae7f33 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Contributor

@barbacbd barbacbd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 9, 2025
@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 11, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: patrickdillon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 11, 2025
@wking wking changed the title OTA-1487: data/manifests/bootkube/cvo-overrides: Default to eus-4.14 OCPBUGS-55193: data/manifests/bootkube/cvo-overrides: Default to eus-4.14 Apr 21, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 21, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wking: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55193, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55193 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.15.0, 4.15.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Like 12e711e (#9373), but for 4.14. Timing on this one has 4.14 leaving the maintenance phase and entering the EUS phase on 2025-05-01. We want 4.14.z that enter fast-4.14 up through that time to keep being added to stable-4.14, but 4.14.z that enter fast-4.14 after that date to only be added to eus-4.14 (and no longer get added to stable-4.14), to help folks who don't meet the EUS qualifications stay on releases that they have support for. Landing this change on 2025-04-28 or so should get us into that position, because 4.14.z built the week of 2025-04-21 through 2025-04-25 would likely be entering fast-4.14 on the week of 2025-04-28 through 2025-05-02.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 21, 2025
@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Apr 21, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wking: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55193, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Apr 21, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 21, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wking: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55193, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55194 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55194 targets the "4.15.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.15.0, 4.15.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @gpei

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from gpei April 21, 2025 21:42
@gpei
Copy link
Contributor

gpei commented Apr 22, 2025

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Apr 22, 2025
@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Apr 28, 2025
@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Apr 28, 2025

From my opening comment:

Landing this change on 2025-04-28 or so should get us into that position...

And here we are on the 28th :)

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 28, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit d92ca63 into openshift:release-4.14 Apr 28, 2025
13 of 16 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wking: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55193: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55193 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Like 12e711e (#9373), but for 4.14. Timing on this one has 4.14 leaving the maintenance phase and entering the EUS phase on 2025-05-01. We want 4.14.z that enter fast-4.14 up through that time to keep being added to stable-4.14, but 4.14.z that enter fast-4.14 after that date to only be added to eus-4.14 (and no longer get added to stable-4.14), to help folks who don't meet the EUS qualifications stay on releases that they have support for. Landing this change on 2025-04-28 or so should get us into that position, because 4.14.z built the week of 2025-04-21 through 2025-04-25 would likely be entering fast-4.14 on the week of 2025-04-28 through 2025-05-02.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@wking wking deleted the eus-4.14-default branch April 28, 2025 20:49
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-baremetal-installer
This PR has been included in build ose-baremetal-installer-container-v4.14.0-202504282038.p0.gd92ca63.assembly.stream.el8.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-installer
This PR has been included in build ose-installer-container-v4.14.0-202504282038.p0.gd92ca63.assembly.stream.el8.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-installer-artifacts
This PR has been included in build ose-installer-artifacts-container-v4.14.0-202504282038.p0.gd92ca63.assembly.stream.el8.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix included in accepted release 4.14.0-0.nightly-2025-04-29-083146

wking added a commit to wking/openshift-installer that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2026
Like 12e711e (data/manifests/bootkube/cvo-overrides: Default to
eus-4.12, 2025-01-15, openshift#9373) and 6ae7f33
(data/manifests/bootkube/cvo-overrides: Default to eus-4.14,
2025-04-08, openshift#9643), but for 4.16.  I'm a bit late this time, with 4.16
already in EUS since the Maintenance phase ended on 2025-12-27:

  $ curl -s 'https://access.redhat.com/product-life-cycles/api/v1/products?name=OpenShift+Container+Platform' | jq -c '.data[].versions[] | select(.name == "4.16").phases[]'
  {"name":"General availability","date":"2024-06-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
  {"name":"Full support","date":"2025-01-01T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
  {"name":"Maintenance support","date":"2025-12-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
  {"name":"Extended update support","date":"2026-06-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
  {"name":"Extended update support Term 2","date":"2027-06-27T00:00:00.000Z","date_format":"date","additional_text":""}
  {"name":"Extended update support Term 3","date":"N/A","date_format":"string","additional_text":""}
  {"name":"Extended life phase","date":"N/A","date_format":"string"}
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants