Skip to content

Conversation

@zhuje
Copy link
Contributor

@zhuje zhuje commented Nov 21, 2024

JIRA

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OU-576

Related Issues

Based on modifications from monitoring-plugin: openshift/monitoring-plugin#264

QE subtask:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OU-576

Demo

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15yfDqW4Nt_8IyN8BiX-lmhffeph-6Tln/view?usp=sharing
Figure 1. Video demo (~3 min). Shows TLS certificates being dynamically reloaded. Shows logging-view-plugin pod logs that describe the reason for reloading and shows new certificate present in a pod using openssl s_client.

/hold
For QE testing

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 21, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 21, 2024

@zhuje: This pull request references OU-539 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Based on modifications: openshift/monitoring-plugin#264

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 21, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 21, 2024

@zhuje: This pull request references OU-539 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Based on modifications: openshift/monitoring-plugin#264

Trying to Resolve
OU-575

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@zhuje
Copy link
Contributor Author

zhuje commented Nov 21, 2024

/hold

/cc @anpingli
This PR is trying to address OU-575. Could you test it?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from anpingli November 21, 2024 23:01
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 21, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 10, 2024

@zhuje: This pull request references OU-539 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

TODO

clean up code
set log level to info, see logrus.InfoLevel.String() openshift/monitoring-plugin#264

JIRA

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OU-576

Related Issues

Based on modifications from monitoring-plugin: openshift/monitoring-plugin#264

Demo

Figure 1. Video demo (~3 min). Shows TLS certificates being dynamically reloaded. Shows logging-view-plugin pod logs that describe the reason for reloading and shows new certificate present in a pod using openssl s_client.

/hold
For QE testing

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 10, 2024

@zhuje: This pull request references OU-539 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

TODO

  • clean up code

JIRA

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OU-576

Related Issues

Based on modifications from monitoring-plugin: openshift/monitoring-plugin#264

Demo

Figure 1. Video demo (~3 min). Shows TLS certificates being dynamically reloaded. Shows logging-view-plugin pod logs that describe the reason for reloading and shows new certificate present in a pod using openssl s_client.

/hold
For QE testing

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 10, 2024

@zhuje: This pull request references OU-539 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

TODO

  • clean up code

JIRA

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OU-576

Related Issues

Based on modifications from monitoring-plugin: openshift/monitoring-plugin#264

Demo

[TODO ADD LINK from Drive]
Figure 1. Video demo (~3 min). Shows TLS certificates being dynamically reloaded. Shows logging-view-plugin pod logs that describe the reason for reloading and shows new certificate present in a pod using openssl s_client.

/hold
For QE testing

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@zhuje zhuje force-pushed the OCPBUGS-35726_reload_cert_key branch from d55dc52 to be835ac Compare December 10, 2024 23:10
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 10, 2024

@zhuje: This pull request references OU-539 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

TODO

  • clean up code

JIRA

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OU-576

Related Issues

Based on modifications from monitoring-plugin: openshift/monitoring-plugin#264

Demo

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15yfDqW4Nt_8IyN8BiX-lmhffeph-6Tln/view?usp=drive_link
Figure 1. Video demo (~3 min). Shows TLS certificates being dynamically reloaded. Shows logging-view-plugin pod logs that describe the reason for reloading and shows new certificate present in a pod using openssl s_client.

/hold
For QE testing

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 10, 2024

@zhuje: This pull request references OU-539 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

JIRA

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OU-576

Related Issues

Based on modifications from monitoring-plugin: openshift/monitoring-plugin#264

Demo

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15yfDqW4Nt_8IyN8BiX-lmhffeph-6Tln/view?usp=drive_link
Figure 1. Video demo (~3 min). Shows TLS certificates being dynamically reloaded. Shows logging-view-plugin pod logs that describe the reason for reloading and shows new certificate present in a pod using openssl s_client.

/hold
For QE testing

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 11, 2024

@Elno5: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@zhuje zhuje force-pushed the OCPBUGS-35726_reload_cert_key branch from be835ac to cb5ee7f Compare December 11, 2024 00:12
@zhuje zhuje force-pushed the OCPBUGS-35726_reload_cert_key branch from cb5ee7f to 7f85c1f Compare December 11, 2024 00:42
@zhuje
Copy link
Contributor Author

zhuje commented Dec 11, 2024

/cc @anpingli

I pushed some changes, could you test this PR?

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 11, 2024

@zhuje: This pull request references OU-539 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target either version "4.19." or "openshift-4.19.", but it targets "Openshift 4.19" instead.

In response to this:

JIRA

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OU-576

Related Issues

Based on modifications from monitoring-plugin: openshift/monitoring-plugin#264

QE subtask:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OU-576

Demo

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15yfDqW4Nt_8IyN8BiX-lmhffeph-6Tln/view?usp=sharing
Figure 1. Video demo (~3 min). Shows TLS certificates being dynamically reloaded. Shows logging-view-plugin pod logs that describe the reason for reloading and shows new certificate present in a pod using openssl s_client.

/hold
For QE testing

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 11, 2024

@Elno5: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 11, 2024

@Elno5: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@anpingli
Copy link

The fix works well. We can merge it.

@anpingli
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 13, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 13, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: anpingli, Elno5, zhuje

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jgbernalp
Copy link
Contributor

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 13, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 13, 2024

@zhuje: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 3ad1033 into openshift:main Dec 13, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants