Skip to content

Conversation

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor

@kasturinarra kasturinarra commented Oct 7, 2025

Which issue(s) this PR addresses: PR enables TLSv1.3 profile for release scenarios

Closes #USHIFT-6164

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from ggiguash and jogeo October 7, 2025 08:40
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 7, 2025
@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pacevedom @agullon could you please help review again ? thanks !!

@kasturinarra kasturinarra changed the title Enable TLSv1.3 for release scenarios USHIFT-6164: Enable TLSv1.3 for release scenarios Oct 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 8, 2025

@kasturinarra: This pull request references USHIFT-6164 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Which issue(s) this PR addresses: PR enables TLSv1.3 profile for release scenarios

Closes #USHIFT-6164

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

run_command_on_vm host1 "sudo systemctl restart microshift"

# Wait for MicroShift to be ready
wait_for_microshift host1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you point me to this function? it looks like it does not exist

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolved.


# Sourced from scenario.sh and uses functions defined there.

start_image="rhel96-bootc-brew-${LATEST_RELEASE_TYPE}"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This image does not exist, for this reason the test are not being executed:

+ 10:36:14.297508226 microshift/_output/scenarios-bootc/el96-lrel@tlsv13.sh:9 	echo 'Image '\''rhel96-bootc-brew-ec'\'' not found - skipping test'
Image 'rhel96-bootc-brew-ec' not found - skipping test
Suggested change
start_image="rhel96-bootc-brew-${LATEST_RELEASE_TYPE}"
start_image="rhel96-bootc-brew-${LATEST_RELEASE_TYPE}-with-optional"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. addressed.

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-arm

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@agullon could you please help review again ? comments addressed and all tests have passed.

@agullon
Copy link
Contributor

agullon commented Oct 13, 2025

@kasturinarra why did you decide it to run standard1 only? and not standard2?

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kasturinarra why did you decide it to run standard1 only? and not standard2?

Nothing specific about it, i can add standarad2 as well , would you like me to add it ?

@agullon
Copy link
Contributor

agullon commented Oct 13, 2025

@kasturinarra why did you decide it to run standard1 only? and not standard2?

Nothing specific about it, i can add standarad2 as well , would you like me to add it ?

Yes, please. I'd like to have both standard suites. Everything else looks good to me, btw.

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc /test e2e-aws-tests-release /test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm

run_tests host1 \
--variable "EXPECTED_OS_VERSION:9.6" \
--exclude tls-configuration \
suites/standard1/ suites/standard2/ suites/selinux/validate-selinux-policy.robot
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both standard1 and standard2 can not be executed in the same scenario because they take more than 30 mins to run. Each of them takes about 25 mins. There's a default timeout set to 30 min.

To solve this, I suggest splitting this scenario in 2, for example: el96-lrel@tlsv13_standard1.sh and el96-lrel@tlsv13_standard2.sh.

run_tests host1 \
--variable "EXPECTED_OS_VERSION:9.6" \
--exclude tls-configuration \
suites/standard1/ suites/standard2/ suites/selinux/validate-selinux-policy.robot
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both standard1 and standard2 can not be executed in the same scenario because they take more than 30 mins to run. Each of them takes about 25 mins. There's a default timeout set to 30 min.

To solve this, I suggest splitting this scenario in 2, for example: el96-lrel@tlsv13_standard1.sh and el96-lrel@tlsv13_standard2.sh.

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-release

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-release

1 similar comment
@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-release

@agullon
Copy link
Contributor

agullon commented Oct 15, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 15, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: agullon, kasturinarra

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [agullon,kasturinarra]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/verified by ci

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Oct 15, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@kasturinarra: This PR has been marked as verified by ci.

In response to this:

/verified by ci

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD de70e79 and 2 for PR HEAD d20b564 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2025

@kasturinarra: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit fcab27f into openshift:main Oct 15, 2025
13 checks passed
@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@kasturinarra: new pull request created: #5618

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants