Skip to content

Conversation

@logonoff
Copy link
Member

after:
image
image
image
image

@PeterYurkovich
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@PeterYurkovich
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 18, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: logonoff, PeterYurkovich

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 18, 2025
@logonoff logonoff changed the title [release-4.19] OCPBUGS-63531: Improve alignment with console SDK OCPBUGS-63531: [release-4.19] Improve alignment with console SDK Nov 18, 2025
@logonoff logonoff added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@logonoff: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63531, which is invalid:

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

after:
image
image
image
image

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@logonoff
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@logonoff: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63531, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.19.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63162 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63162 targets the "4.20.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.20.0, 4.20.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @etmurasaki

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from etmurasaki November 18, 2025 19:07
@PeterYurkovich
Copy link
Contributor

/label ux-approved
No UX changes needed for review

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the ux-approved Signifies that UX has signed off on this PR label Nov 18, 2025
@jgbernalp
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 19, 2025

@logonoff: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@etmurasaki
Copy link
Contributor

/label qe-approved

  • Automated testing passed
  • Favorite and unfavorite functionality working fine
  • Virtualization perspective - Alerting pages didn't get changed as expected, Dashboard Perses as well
  • ACM perspective - Alerting pages didn't get changed as expected, Dashboard Perses as well

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Nov 21, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@logonoff: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63531, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.19.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63162 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63162 targets the "4.20.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.20.0, 4.20.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @etmurasaki

In response to this:

after:
image
image
image
image

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@etmurasaki
Copy link
Contributor

/verified by @etmurasaki

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Nov 21, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@etmurasaki: This PR has been marked as verified by @etmurasaki.

In response to this:

/verified by @etmurasaki

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 9f7013e into openshift:release-4.19 Nov 21, 2025
6 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@logonoff: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63531
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63531 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

In response to this:

after:
image
image
image
image

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@logonoff logonoff deleted the OCPBUGS-63531 branch November 21, 2025 13:30
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix included in accepted release 4.19.0-0.nightly-2025-11-21-184523

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR ux-approved Signifies that UX has signed off on this PR verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants