Technology Preview 3 - release notes updates #12596
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
size/M
|
/ok-to-test |
openshift-ci-robot
removed
the
needs-ok-to-test
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since this is a fixed issue, we don't need the workaround anymore.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same, we can delete the workaround once the issue moves to the fixed file.
geekspertise
force-pushed
the
servicemesh
branch
from
dcd9a3c to
61348af
Compare
|
Per #12589, it sounds like these changes should not be applied to 3.10. |
|
@kalexand-rh I've asked for clarification on that from @knrc . |
|
@JStickler @kalexand-rh TP3 (maistra 0.3.0) is based on OCP 3.11. |
|
@geekspertise, were you going to make updates on this PR so that we can merge it? At the very least, we probably need to rebase against the latest changes to master. |
geekspertise
force-pushed
the
servicemesh
branch
from
61348af to
ea4de71
Compare
|
@JStickler I rebased and force pushed to the servicemesh branch. @kalexand-rh and @vikram-redhat should be good to merge. |
|
@geekspertise, @JStickler, what's your new release date? |
|
@kalexand-rh Wednesday 10/31. |
|
@JStickler, if I merge now, they should go live overnight. Does that sound good to you? |
|
@kalexand-rh that sounds great. Thanks! |
|
Great! Merging this PR and #12578 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-3.11 |
|
@kalexand-rh: new pull request created: #12712 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
7 participants
Updated servicemesh release notes for technology preview 3. @JStickler can you peer review? Already reviewed new content with @knrc and @tvieira.