-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
Update the Dockerfile to use downstream images #6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update the Dockerfile to use downstream images #6
Conversation
Signed-off-by: timflannagan <timflannagan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: timflannagan <timflannagan@gmail.com>
@timflannagan: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
return nil, err | ||
} | ||
if bi.Status.InstalledBundleName == "" { | ||
if bi.Status.ActiveBundle == "" { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this supposed to come along?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, but I had sneaked it in. My IDE was complaining about it locally.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I think it's ok -- we changed the name of that field upstream and it probably never got updated in the e2e test on the PO side.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
return nil, err | ||
} | ||
if bi.Status.InstalledBundleName == "" { | ||
if bi.Status.ActiveBundle == "" { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I think it's ok -- we changed the name of that field upstream and it probably never got updated in the e2e test on the PO side.
io.k8s.description="This is a component of OpenShift Container Platform and manages the lifecycle of platform operators." \ | ||
io.openshift.tags="openshift" \ | ||
summary="This is a component of OpenShift Container Platform and manages the lifecycle of platform operators." \ | ||
maintainer="Odin Team <aos-odin@redhat.com>" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: can we update this to a more recent email? We could use the olm dev working group email.
That email is set up from Evan and I'm not sure the current status of who is monitoring it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, just a copy/paste error. We'll have this issue across multiple repos, so probably best to update it uniformly.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: exdx, timflannagan The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Update dockerfile and use the rhel-related base images. Run the build Makefile target in the builder image and copy that PO manager executable into the final image layer.