Skip to content

Conversation

andrewpmartinez
Copy link
Member

Should this have a major version bump?

@andrewpmartinez andrewpmartinez requested a review from a team as a code owner September 2, 2025 13:41
Copy link
Member

@plorenz plorenz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall, looks good. I don't think we need to bump the version, since these are structures that are not exposed in the Context/edge.Conn api.

To address:

  1. Question about making the data fields atomic
  2. There's some compile failures in the tests.
  3. This needs to be rebased on main, 1.2.3 has already been released and this is showing the EnableHA PR changes as well.

@andrewpmartinez andrewpmartinez force-pushed the add.generic.msg.sink branch 2 times, most recently from 9ca871f to 157bfb7 Compare September 3, 2025 13:18
- rename MsgMux to ConnMux, as it muxes Conns
- rename sinkId to connId, as that is the language of Conn's
- add doc
- add generic meta data for MsgSink
- remove jwt refreshing client test program
@andrewpmartinez andrewpmartinez merged commit 781ec45 into main Sep 16, 2025
4 checks passed
@andrewpmartinez andrewpmartinez deleted the add.generic.msg.sink branch September 16, 2025 14:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants