e2e local test for mac

[akihikokuroda]

Signed-off-by: akihikokuroda akihikokuroda2020@gmail.com

Description of the change:
For e2e local test, make build builds linux binaries by adding GOENV='GOOS=linux' in the command.

Motivation for the change:
Closes #784
Reviewer Checklist

• Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
• Sufficient unit test coverage
• Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
• Docs updated or added to /docs
• Commit messages sensible and descriptive

[openshift-ci]

Hi @akihikokuroda. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a operator-framework member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[dinhxuanvu]

/ok-to-test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #785 (cc2659e) into master (829551e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #785   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   51.20%   51.20%           
=======================================
  Files         103      103           
  Lines        9077     9077           
=======================================
  Hits         4648     4648           
  Misses       3550     3550           
  Partials      879      879           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 829551e...cc2659e. Read the comment docs.

[akihikokuroda]

I don't understand the go-apidiff / go-apidiff failure. Should I rebase?

[joelanford]

I don't understand the go-apidiff / go-apidiff failure. Should I rebase?

Yes, please! It looks like those failures are unrelated to your PR.

[exdx]

This looks good for me to lgtm but it should be squashed down to just one commit with the code change. Maybe just cherry-pick the latest commit onto the HEAD of latest master.

[timflannagan]

@exdx We updated tide for this repository (and OLM) to automatically squash merge everything unless specified otherwise.

[timflannagan]

Oh, sorry I misunderstood what you meant - it looks like we're pulling in unrelated changes in this PR?

[akihikokuroda]

I've just rebased instead of merging from master. Thanks!

[exdx]

/lgtm

[njhale]

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: akihikokuroda, njhale

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [njhale]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment