-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 261
Add skip-tls-verify and use-http flag support to opm render #908 #909
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add skip-tls-verify and use-http flag support to opm render #908 #909
Conversation
|
Hi @ryanemerson. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a operator-framework member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
joelanford
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR! Just a few minor suggestions...
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #909 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 52.18% 52.18%
=======================================
Files 103 103
Lines 9113 9113
=======================================
Hits 4756 4756
Misses 3451 3451
Partials 906 906 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
…framework#908 Signed-off-by: Ryan Emerson <remerson@redhat.com>
71e147c to
4bfb402
Compare
|
/ok-to-test |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: joelanford, ryanemerson The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Is this likely to be merged soon please? |
Hey @joelanford, do you have a timeframe for when this is going into a release please? |
|
/lgtm |
|
@phantomjinx usually we try to release minor versions of the registry on the same cadence as OLM releases, although our release process hasn't been the most consistent. our last release was only a few weeks ago, so my guess is it may be a little while until the next patch release. but if there's an urgent need for this patch, you could create an issue on this repository, tag this, and we can talk about cutting a release sooner in the upstream olm working group. |
|
@kevinrizza I have created #925. I have included details of Operatorhub changes that explain why a release is needed by April, thanks. |
#908