-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
Add Lumen support and integration tests #82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Pull Request Review: Add Lumen Support and Integration TestsThank you for adding Lumen support to the package! This is a valuable addition that expands the framework compatibility. Here's my detailed review: ✅ Strengths
🔍 Code Quality Issues1. Service Provider - Missing Facade Import (src/LaravelMcpServerServiceProvider.php:5)The use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Route; // Line 5 - Only used for Laravel Issue: This could cause confusion. When Lumen routing is detected, the facade isn't needed. Recommendation: Consider conditionally using the facade or document why it's needed: // If you need it for Laravel only, add a comment explaining the dual usage
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Route; // Used for Laravel routing (not Lumen) 2. Configuration Method - Potential Issues (src/LaravelMcpServerServiceProvider.php:155-162)The protected function registerConfiguration(): void
{
if ($this->isLumenApplication() && \! $this->app['config']->has('mcp-server')) {
$this->app->configure('mcp-server');
}
$this->mergeConfigFrom(__DIR__.'/../config/mcp-server.php', 'mcp-server');
} Issue: The Lumen Recommendation: Either:
protected function registerConfiguration(): void
{
$this->mergeConfigFrom(__DIR__.'/../config/mcp-server.php', 'mcp-server');
// For Lumen: If user has a custom config file, load it
if ($this->isLumenApplication() && file_exists($this->app->basePath('config/mcp-server.php'))) {
$this->app->configure('mcp-server');
}
} 3. Type Hints Missing (src/LaravelMcpServerServiceProvider.php:164, 183)Methods lack return type hints: protected function getConfig(string $key, $default = null) // Line 164
protected function registerLumenRoutes($router, ?string $domain, string $path, array $middlewares, string $provider): void // Line 183 Recommendation: protected function getConfig(string $key, mixed $default = null): mixed
protected function registerLumenRoutes(
\Laravel\Lumen\Routing\Router $router,
?string $domain,
string $path,
array $middlewares,
string $provider
): void 4. PHPStan ConcernGiven the project uses PHPStan level 5, the Lumen class checks might trigger warnings: protected function isLumenApplication(): bool
{
return class_exists(\Laravel\Lumen\Application::class) && $this->app instanceof \Laravel\Lumen\Application;
} Recommendation: Add PHPStan ignore comments if needed, or verify these don't cause issues: /** @phpstan-ignore-next-line Lumen support is optional */
protected function isLumenApplication(): bool 🐛 Potential Bugs1. Default Case in Switch (src/LaravelMcpServerServiceProvider.php:202-206)In case 'streamable_http':
default:
$router->get($path, [StreamableHttpController::class, 'getHandle']);
$router->post($path, [StreamableHttpController::class, 'postHandle']);
break; But in Recommendation: Add consistent default handling: case 'streamable_http':
default:
$routeRegistrar->get($path, [StreamableHttpController::class, 'getHandle']);
$routeRegistrar->post($path, [StreamableHttpController::class, 'postHandle']);
break; 2. Router Instance Check (src/LaravelMcpServerServiceProvider.php:125)The code makes the router directly: $router = $this->app->make('router'); Concern: In some edge cases, the 'router' binding might not exist or return an unexpected type. Recommendation: Add defensive check: if (\!$this->app->bound('router')) {
return;
}
$router = $this->app->make('router'); 🧪 Test Coverage Issues1. Missing Test ScenariosThe Lumen tests cover basic cases but miss:
Recommendation: Add these test cases: it('registers routes with multiple domains in lumen', function () {
$this->app['config']->set('mcp-server.domain', ['api.example.com', 'admin.example.com']);
// ... test multiple domains
});
it('applies middlewares to lumen routes', function () {
$this->app['config']->set('mcp-server.middlewares', ['auth:api', 'throttle:60,1']);
// ... verify middleware attachment
}); 2. Test Helper Function Duplication (tests/Lumen/LumenRouteRegistrationTest.php:16-43)The Recommendation: Consider extracting to a shared trait/helper class to reduce duplication and maintain consistency. ⚡ Performance Considerations1. Router Resolution (src/LaravelMcpServerServiceProvider.php:125)The router is resolved from the container on every Recommendation: Resolve once before the loop: protected function registerRoutes(): void
{
// ... existing checks ...
$router = $this->app->make('router');
$domains = $this->normalizeDomains($domain);
foreach ($domains as $domainName) {
$this->registerRoutesForDomain($router, $domainName, $path, $middlewares, $provider);
}
}
protected function registerRoutesForDomain($router, ?string $domain, ...): void 🔐 Security ConcernsNo significant security issues identified. The implementation maintains the same security posture as the Laravel version. 📚 Documentation Issues1. README.md Ordering (README.md:288-313)The Lumen setup section appears right after requirements but before "Basic Usage". Recommendation: Consider adding a table of contents or separating into "Laravel Setup" and "Lumen Setup" sections more clearly. 2. Incomplete Instructions (README.md:313)The note states:
Issue: This isn't entirely clear because of the Recommendation: Clarify: (Steps 3-4 are optional. If you skip them, the package will use the default configuration. To customize the configuration, you must complete both steps.) 📦 Composer Changes1. Orchestra Testbench Version Constraint (composer.json:20)Changed from: "orchestra/testbench": "^10.0.0||^9.0.0||^8.22.0" To: "orchestra/testbench": "^9.0.0||^8.22.0" Question: Why was ^10.0.0 removed? Is there an incompatibility with Lumen? Recommendation: Add a comment in the commit message or PR description explaining this change. ✨ Recommendations SummaryHigh Priority:
Medium Priority: Low Priority: 🎯 Overall AssessmentQuality Score: 7.5/10 This is a solid implementation that adds valuable Lumen support without breaking existing functionality. The main concerns are around:
The code follows the repository's conventions and CLAUDE.md guidelines well. With the recommended fixes, this would be an excellent addition to the package. Recommendation: Approve with requested changes ✅ Great work on this feature! Let me know if you'd like me to clarify any of these points or help implement the suggested changes. |
Summary
Testing
Issue #69
https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68eab737ce7483219b8167f43ece8b89