Refactor internal store

[dgarros]

This PR refactor the internal store to be easier to use and to cover more use cases
The main changes is the introduction of a new internal_id on all nodes to simplify how the nodes are organized within the store event before have been created in Infrahub.
Also with this change the store is now branch-aware and by default objects from 2 different branches will be isolated from each other.
And last but not least, it's now easier to search node based on their HFID both with the flat version or the structured one.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 74.21053% with 49 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
infrahub_sdk/store.py	75.51%	15 Missing and 21 partials ⚠️
infrahub_sdk/node.py	66.66%	6 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
infrahub_sdk/protocols_base.py	40.00%	0 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
infrahub_sdk/client.py	83.33%	1 Missing ⚠️
infrahub_sdk/generator.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #323      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    71.32%   71.46%   +0.13%     
===========================================
  Files           87       87              
  Lines         7871     7990     +119     
  Branches      1517     1544      +27     
===========================================
+ Hits          5614     5710      +96     
- Misses        1865     1875      +10     
- Partials       392      405      +13     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration-tests	22.76% <24.73%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
python-3.10	45.66% <52.10%> (+0.21%)	⬆️
python-3.11	45.66% <52.10%> (+0.18%)	⬆️
python-3.12	45.66% <52.10%> (+0.18%)	⬆️
python-3.13	45.66% <52.10%> (+0.18%)	⬆️
python-3.9	44.60% <52.10%> (+0.22%)	⬆️
python-filler-3.12	24.60% <23.15%> (-0.06%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
infrahub_sdk/exceptions.py	82.29% <100.00%> (+0.37%)	⬆️
infrahub_sdk/utils.py	80.25% <100.00%> (+0.34%)	⬆️
infrahub_sdk/client.py	67.78% <83.33%> (ø)
infrahub_sdk/generator.py	35.44% <0.00%> (ø)
infrahub_sdk/protocols_base.py	77.77% <40.00%> (-2.03%)	⬇️
infrahub_sdk/node.py	77.27% <66.66%> (-0.21%)	⬇️
infrahub_sdk/store.py	76.43% <75.51%> (+9.36%)	⬆️

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[BeArchiTek]

Tested as replacement of #321, all good for me

[ogenstad]

Looks good overall to me, but there seems to be some issues that need to be resolved as highlighted by the infrastructure_edge script. Also I don't think that we should add that extra package.

[ogenstad]

This error is raised when running infrahub_edge.py would be good with a pipeline in the Infrahub repo for this PR.

[ogenstad]

I think it was like this before but it might be unexpected for users that have configured a different default branch when initializing the SDK and then just use these store objects where we default to "main".

[dgarros]

I removed the default branch for now but it will introduce a "breaking change" so not 100% sure if we should go with it

[ogenstad]

No with that in mind I'd suggest to keep it as is and instead create an issue so that we cycle back and refactor this in a controlled manner.

[dgarros]

I added the default branch back along with a deprecation warning

[ogenstad]

Based on the changes done in infrastructure_edge.py are we introducing any kind of breaking changes what would impact other scripts out there? Also does this need a news fragment or will that come in the follow up work?

[dgarros]

Based on the changes done in infrastructure_edge.py are we introducing any kind of breaking changes what would impact other scripts out there? Also does this need a news fragment or will that come in the follow up work?

I will add a fragment

If we add back the default branch I think it should work out of the box for existing users but I asked the CS team to do a quick check just to be sure