Adding auto healing for kubernetes

[utkarsh232005]

Right now, the kdm-cli is limited to monitoring Kubernetes and Docker environments, but it does not actively assist developers during pod failures or infrastructure crises. Instead of being just a monitoring tool, kdm-cli should evolve into a developer-support utility that can help diagnose issues, provide actionable insights, suggest fixes, automate recovery steps, and simplify troubleshooting during pod crashes, deployment failures, resource exhaustion, or cluster instability.

[utkarsh232005]

@KDM-cli/core add your review on this

[Yuvraj-Sarathe]

We can make a tool that analyses error logs. It does not specifically need an LLM or API just some bunch of hardcoded suggestions can work like detecting file missing log error can just ask the user to handle the missing path file and etc.

Other commands like typo error or bad syntax in some file can also be assessed that way.

However, we cannot make an auto-correct engine or QnA type AI because that will require API keys and then keeping this free will not be possible.

Our options are limited and thus this might be the only way to upgrade

[utkarsh232005]

We can give options to them to add their api key for autohealing purpose which will store inside os keychain for security

[Yuvraj-Sarathe]

Well, still, I would prefer making a preset of data to feed into the AI about debugging because it will make it easier for them first, even without AI that can work for the most part.

Consider it like this: someone may not be comfortable enough to add an API call for an AI in his terminal during prod. But he still might need help; there we can make the pre-trained set of instructions to give and give him the answers to debugging.

Lastly, the AI we will be adding will not be as useful as one may think due to the restrictions of editing a file source. That AI also will just tell the debugging solution or point out that the syntax is not quite right; thus, the error occurred. This, to some extent, could be done without AI, but obviously AI would be better at that.

What it cannot do, though, is directly edit the file to solve the error because that will require giving it access to personal files that one may not want to give. Plus, we do not know which version they would be using, so a bad AI can break the code more than it can build.

The best we can do is make a preset of instructions that will be first fed into the AI before any prompt so it knows what the guidelines of production and deployment are. But another problem arises: CONTEXT LIMIT! Since this is such a big task, the pre-prompt might already fill it to the brim, let alone costing the API charges from the user!

My suggestion would be to develop such a function that figures out the problem via logs and tells the user what to do. Our breakthrough can be analyzing and catching errors before anything is broken as it runs simultaneously with the logs/workflow.