Implicit AND differs from explicit AND for is:issue is:merged on Issues page
#198843
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🏷️ Discussion Type
Bug
💬 Feature/Topic Area
Code Search and Navigation
Body
On the repository Issues page, the filter
is:issue is:mergedappears to return merged pull requests.I would expect this query to return no results, because
is:issueshould exclude pull requests, andis:mergedonly applies to pull requests.However:
is:issue is:mergedreturns merged PRs.is:issue AND is:mergedreturns no results, as expected.According to GitHub's search documentation, spaces between search terms should be treated as implicit
AND, so these two queries should be equivalent.This looks like implicit
ANDand explicitANDare handled differently for this combination of qualifiers on the Issues page.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions