Repeated false rejections from Student Developer Pack verification despite valid school documents #198894
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🏷️ Discussion Type
Bug
💬 Feature/Topic Area
Verification Help & Guidance
Hi everyone,
I am a Class XII student in India and I have been trying to get the GitHub Student Developer Pack for a while now. The application keeps getting turned down even though I keep uploading what should be proper proof through their academic enrollment proof verification.
Initially, there were genuine issues that needed to be resolved like lack of billing information. However, even after resolving those issues, every re-application for verification keeps getting rejected with the message, "We were unfortunately not able to verify your academic status. Please address the following issues and apply again.", even though there is NO issue listed.
I have already tried:
Despite this, the system continues producing objectively incorrect rejection reasons.
What makes this genuinely more frustrating is the lack of any meaningful escalation or manual review path at all for legitimate students affected by false automated rejections or without getting redirected ten times, especially for institutions outside standardized Western academic formatting conventions.
I would appreciate clarification regarding:
Currently, the process feels less like student verification and more like trying to satisfy an OCR model that rejects valid documents while failing to correctly read clearly visible institutional information.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions