Replies: 2 comments 13 replies
-
|
Hello and good day @benja-M-1 you need to change the group name to a unique identifier that doesn't overlap between issues. For example, you could use a combination of the issue number and a timestamp. Pseudo code -> you need to test if it works.
to ensure each workflow has a unique identifier. Because atm workflow is cancelled when a new workflow with a higher priority (a newer issue number) is triggered. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
🕒 Discussion Activity Reminder 🕒 This Discussion has been labeled as dormant by an automated system for having no activity in the last 60 days. Please consider one the following actions: 1️⃣ Close as Out of Date: If the topic is no longer relevant, close the Discussion as 2️⃣ Provide More Information: Share additional details or context — or let the community know if you've found a solution on your own. 3️⃣ Mark a Reply as Answer: If your question has been answered by a reply, mark the most helpful reply as the solution. Note: This dormant notification will only apply to Discussions with the Thank you for helping bring this Discussion to a resolution! 💬 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Select Topic Area
Question
Body
Hi,
I have a workflow that runs on issues.opened, issues.reopened, issues.edited, issue_comment.created, and issue_comment.edited.
I want to make sure that there is only one workflow running for each issue. So I tried the following at the workflow level and the job level:
Since every event triggering the workflow contain the
issuein the payload, there should not be any issue. It works perfectly within the steps, for example.If I open issue A and then issue B, the running workflow for issue A is cancelled. I expected to have the two workflows running, as the group name is based on the issue number. But actually, it does not. The workflow for issue A is cancelled with the following message:
Canceling since a higher priority waiting request for 'submission-' existsDid I miss something?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions