Replies: 5 comments
-
|
It's better than File Format Wiki! 😅 +1 though, seems a fair idea to change for something more generic/accessible. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Just to note that the spammers worked around this anyway, and COPTR has ended up drowning in spam. It is not really sustainable in it's current form. I'm working with @carlwilson to clean things up a bit, but really we need a different approach. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This was one of the motivating factors for moving the a/v artifact atlas from a wiki-base to github-based platform, where it now sits running on the Jekyll framework. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks @ross-spencer @ablwr - I'm pretty sure tweaking the current COPTR approach is off the table, so I've closed this and I'm attempting to start a more wide-ranging discussion at #53 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks Andy, left a few thoughts on #53. Out of interest, did you and Carl look at options wrt NGINX deny-lists? I managed to get rid of nearly all spamming on one of my ActivityPub instances by blocking a few-user agents I saw most activity from in the access.log, especially Python/requests user-agents. There might be other approaches with specific endpoints. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently, signing up to COPTR means getting past a test that was intended to stop spammers signing up, but is way too exclusive/cliquey (see https://coptr.digipres.org/index.php?title=Special:CreateAccount&returnto=Main+Page)
I mean, really, whose terrible idea was that?! (it was me)
Maybe we can do without it? Or use a ReCAPTCHA instead?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions