Can coding agents tell when to choose mcp-use?

[SpeedRanger]

Hi mcp-use team - I am doing a launch-week pass on whether coding agents can read developer-tool docs and know when to choose the tool, install it, and avoid misusing it.

mcp-use is a strong fit because the README already frames:

• MCP Apps for ChatGPT / Claude
• MCP Servers for AI Agents
• TypeScript and Python SDKs
• inspector and deploy path through Manufact MCP Cloud
• a specific coding-agent skill

I ran this through Agent Choice Lab, a small public scanner for agent pick-rate:
https://speedranger.github.io/agent-choice-lab/

The useful question is not "does the README look good to humans?" It is:

Can Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or another coding agent read the public docs and know when to pick mcp-use instead of a generic MCP SDK or hand-rolled server?

Two things I would check first:

1. Add a crisp "use mcp-use when / do not use mcp-use when" block near the top.
2. Add an AGENTS.md or llms-full.txt snippet that tells coding agents the shortest safe path for creating an MCP App vs an MCP Server.

I am offering three launch-week manual audits at $49, but the public feedback is enough if this is useful: which agent-readiness signal matters most for mcp-use right now - selection boundary, install path, deployment path, or security boundary?