You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For a design optimisation problem with uncertain variable values (e.g. dimensions with tolerance, material properties with uncertainty), Dakota's Optimization Under Uncertainty capabilities seem ideally suited, so I'm trying to learn about the available methods and how to use them. I was wondering:
Say my problem has one uncertain design variable that occurs twice (e.g. a 3-bar truss with two (nominally) identical bars, such as in this tutorial), how can I tell Dakota to consider both instances of this variable as distinct/independent samples from the same distribution? I assume that this doesn't happen automatically?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
For a design optimisation problem with uncertain variable values (e.g. dimensions with tolerance, material properties with uncertainty), Dakota's Optimization Under Uncertainty capabilities seem ideally suited, so I'm trying to learn about the available methods and how to use them. I was wondering:
Say my problem has one uncertain design variable that occurs twice (e.g. a 3-bar truss with two (nominally) identical bars, such as in this tutorial), how can I tell Dakota to consider both instances of this variable as distinct/independent samples from the same distribution? I assume that this doesn't happen automatically?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions