[feature] Caddy handlers separation #61
Conversation
WalkthroughThe updates refine Caddy server configuration for both local and production environments, separating configuration files and improving documentation. The Makefile is adjusted to support validation and formatting of both Caddyfiles. Additionally, the Caddy readme receives a new debugging section with header-forwarding examples. No application logic or exported entities are affected. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Caddy (prod)
participant Go API
participant Vue Frontend
Client->>Caddy (prod): HTTP request to /api/*
Caddy (prod)->>Go API: Proxy request with headers (Host, Auth headers)
Go API-->>Caddy (prod): API response
Caddy (prod)-->>Client: API response
Client->>Caddy (prod): HTTP request to /
Caddy (prod)->>Vue Frontend: Proxy request
Vue Frontend-->>Caddy (prod): Frontend response
Caddy (prod)-->>Client: Frontend response
Estimated code review effort2 (~15 minutes) Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @gocanto, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on enhancing the Caddy server's configuration by implementing explicit handler separation for API and frontend traffic, which streamlines routing and improves maintainability. It also includes updates to the build system to ensure proper validation of both production and local Caddy configurations, alongside minor documentation improvements.
Highlights
- Caddy Configuration Restructuring: I've refactored
caddy/Caddyfile.prodto introduce explicit handler separation. Requests to/api/*are now routed specifically to the Go API backend, while all other traffic is directed to the Vue frontend. This significantly improves the clarity and maintainability of the routing logic. - Caddyfile Maintenance and Documentation: I've made minor comment improvements in
caddy/Caddyfile.localfor better clarity. Additionally, a newcaddy/reademe.mdfile has been added to house useful Caddy debugging snippets, keeping the main production Caddyfile cleaner. - Build System Updates for Caddyfiles: The
config/makefile/app.mkhas been updated to properly manage and validate both production (Caddyfile.prod) and local (Caddyfile.local) Caddy configurations. Thevalidate-caddytarget now ensures consistent formatting and validity across both environments.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
caddy/reademe.md (2)
3-3: Fix heading level to follow markdown conventions.The heading should be h2 (##) instead of h3 (###) to follow proper heading hierarchy after the main h1 title.
- ### Debugging Headers + ## Debugging Headers
4-8: Use proper syntax highlighting for Caddy configuration.The code block uses HTML syntax highlighting, but these are Caddy directives. Consider using a more appropriate syntax highlighter.
- ```html + ```caddyfile header_down X-Debug-Username {http.request.header.X-API-Username} header_down X-Debug-Key {http.request.header.X-API-Key} header_down X-Debug-Signature {http.request.header.X-API-Signature}</blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL** **Plan: Pro** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2fa8755ac4f67d56a7ab4caafc9e172de231511e and c71a9faa236a87613ad4590431a879787db00749. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (4)</summary> * `caddy/Caddyfile.local` (1 hunks) * `caddy/Caddyfile.prod` (2 hunks) * `caddy/reademe.md` (1 hunks) * `config/makefile/app.mk` (2 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)</summary> <details> <summary>caddy/reademe.md</summary> 3-3: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time Expected: h2; Actual: h3 (MD001, heading-increment) </details> </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)</summary> <details> <summary>caddy/reademe.md</summary> 3-3: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time Expected: h2; Actual: h3 (MD001, heading-increment) </details> </details> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (6)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>caddy/Caddyfile.local (1)</summary> `1-21`: **LGTM! Improved documentation and formatting.** The changes enhance the local Caddyfile with better comments explaining the Docker networking setup and clearer formatting. The functional behavior remains unchanged, which is appropriate for the local development environment. </details> <details> <summary>config/makefile/app.mk (2)</summary> `3-4`: **LGTM! Proper separation of configuration files.** The introduction of separate variables for production and local Caddy configurations supports the PR's objective of handler separation and allows independent management of environment-specific configurations. --- `58-61`: **LGTM! Comprehensive validation for both environments.** The updated validate-caddy target properly formats and validates both production and local Caddyfiles, ensuring consistency across environments. </details> <details> <summary>caddy/Caddyfile.prod (3)</summary> `8-17`: **LGTM! Enhanced security headers with clear documentation.** The security headers are well-chosen and properly documented. The comments clearly explain the purpose of each header, improving maintainability. --- `28-45`: **LGTM! Well-implemented API routing with proper configuration.** The API handler correctly: - Uses `handle_path` to strip the `/api/` prefix before forwarding - Preserves the original Host header - Forwards authentication headers - Includes reasonable transport timeouts This implementation properly separates API traffic from frontend routing. --- `47-53`: **Verify production Caddy reverse_proxy target** We didn’t find any references to a service or container named `web_caddy_prod` in your Docker Compose or other YAML manifests. Please confirm that in your production environment you have a service (or container) named `web_caddy_prod` listening on port 80. • File: caddy/Caddyfile.prod (lines 47–53)handle {
reverse_proxy web_caddy_prod:80
}If the actual container/service name or port differs, please update this block to match your production configuration. </details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
caddy/readme.md (1)
3-3: Fix heading-level increment to satisfy Markdown linting (MD001).
### Headersskips directly from H1 to H3. Change to H2 for proper hierarchy.-### Headers +## Headers
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
caddy/readme.md(1 hunks)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
caddy/readme.md
3-3: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3
(MD001, heading-increment)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
caddy/readme.md
3-3: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3
(MD001, heading-increment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request separates Caddy handlers for API and default routes, enhancing configuration clarity. It also updates comments in the Caddyfile to provide more context. The changes in app.mk ensure both production and local Caddyfiles are validated.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Documentation