-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
[hotfix] Caddy CORS #62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe Caddy server configuration files for local and production environments were updated to add CORS support for API endpoints. This includes setting HTTP headers for allowed origins, methods, and headers, and handling CORS preflight OPTIONS requests by returning a 204 status with appropriate headers. Changes
Estimated code review effort1 (~2 minutes) Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @gocanto, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces essential CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) configurations to the Caddy web server setup. The primary goal is to enable a separate frontend application to securely communicate with the backend API by allowing cross-origin requests and properly handling preflight OPTIONS requests. This ensures that both local development and production deployments can function correctly with a decoupled frontend.
Highlights
- CORS Configuration: Implemented Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) headers in Caddy for both local development and production environments to allow secure cross-origin requests.
- Preflight Request Handling: Added specific handling for browser preflight
OPTIONSrequests, configuring Caddy to respond with a 204 No Content status, which is crucial for modern web applications. - Local Development Support: Configured CORS in
Caddyfile.localto allow requests fromhttp://localhost:5173, supporting local Vue application development. - Production Environment Support: Configured CORS in
Caddyfile.prodspecifically for the/api/*path, allowing requests fromhttps://oullin.ioin the production environment.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds CORS headers to the Caddy configurations for both local and production environments to allow cross-origin requests from the frontend application. The changes are straightforward and should resolve the immediate CORS issue.
My review includes a couple of suggestions to improve the robustness of the implementation:
- The preflight
OPTIONSrequest handler should be more specific to only match actual CORS preflight requests. - I've also noted the potential need for
Access-Control-Allow-Credentialsif your application uses cookies or other forms of credentials.
These changes will make your CORS configuration more secure and correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
caddy/Caddyfile.local (1)
16-20: Consider scoping CORS headers to API endpoints only.The CORS headers are applied globally to all requests in the local environment, which may not be necessary. Consider moving these headers inside a
handle_path /api/*block to match the production configuration and avoid exposing CORS headers for static assets.- header { - Access-Control-Allow-Origin "http://localhost:5173" # allows the Vue app (running on localhost:5173) to make requests. - Access-Control-Allow-Methods "GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS" # Specifies which methods are allowed. - Access-Control-Allow-Headers "X-API-Key, X-API-Username, X-API-Signature, Content-Type, User-Agent" # allows the custom headers needed by the API. - } + handle_path /api/* { + header { + Access-Control-Allow-Origin "http://localhost:5173" # allows the Vue app (running on localhost:5173) to make requests. + Access-Control-Allow-Methods "GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS" # Specifies which methods are allowed. + Access-Control-Allow-Headers "X-API-Key, X-API-Username, X-API-Signature, Content-Type, User-Agent" # allows the custom headers needed by the API. + } + + @preflight { + method OPTIONS + } + + respond @preflight 204 + + reverse_proxy api:8080 + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
caddy/Caddyfile.local(1 hunks)caddy/Caddyfile.prod(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
caddy/Caddyfile.prod (2)
34-38: CORS headers configuration looks correct.The CORS headers are properly configured for production with appropriate restrictions:
- Origin limited to the specific production domain
- Methods restricted to necessary HTTP verbs
- Headers allow required API authentication headers
40-44: Preflight handling implementation is correct.The preflight OPTIONS request handling is properly implemented:
- Named matcher correctly identifies OPTIONS requests
- Returns appropriate 204 No Content status
- Positioned before the reverse_proxy directive to avoid unnecessary backend calls
caddy/Caddyfile.local (1)
23-27: Preflight handling is correctly implemented.The preflight OPTIONS request handling follows the same pattern as production and is properly positioned before the reverse_proxy directive.
Summary by CodeRabbit