test: stabilize component specs #22
Conversation
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe test files for several components were updated to improve and extend mocking and stubbing strategies. These changes include enhanced mocks for external modules (such as Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant TestRunner
participant HighlightJSMock
participant PublicMock
participant ComponentUnderTest
TestRunner->>HighlightJSMock: Import and mock highlight.js/lib/core
TestRunner->>PublicMock: Import and mock @/public.ts
TestRunner->>ComponentUnderTest: Mount component with global stubs/mocks
ComponentUnderTest-->>TestRunner: Rendered output using mocks/stubs
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @gocanto, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on enhancing the stability and reliability of various component tests. The changes involve updating mocking strategies for external dependencies, stubbing router links, and adjusting test setups to align with new component prop and route requirements. The overall goal is to ensure tests are more robust and less prone to breaking due to external factors or component updates.
Highlights
- PostPage Test Stability: Updated the mocking of highlight.js to target its core library and introduced mocking for public.ts utilities (like initializeHighlighter, date, getReadingTime) to ensure isolated testing of the PostPage component.
- RouterLink Stubbing: Implemented stubbing for RouterLink components in ArticleItemPartial and ArticlesListPartial tests. This prevents test failures related to vue-router and allows for more focused component testing.
- Avatar and SideNav Test Adjustments: Modified tests for AvatarPartial to explicitly pass width and height props, reflecting potential changes in component prop handling. Additionally, expanded the mocked router configuration for SideNavPartial to include more routes, ensuring comprehensive testing of navigation links.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to stabilize component tests by improving mocks and stubs. The changes in PostPage.test.ts correctly update mocks for syntax highlighting and utility functions. The tests for ArticleItemPartial and ArticlesListPartial are improved by stubbing RouterLink, which is a good practice for isolating component tests. The test router setup in SideNavPartial.test.ts is also correctly updated to include all necessary routes. I have one suggestion for AvatarPartial.test.ts to improve the quality of the test for default props.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
tests/pages/PostPage.test.ts(1 hunks)tests/partials/ArticleItemPartial.test.ts(1 hunks)tests/partials/ArticlesListPartial.test.ts(1 hunks)tests/partials/AvatarPartial.test.ts(1 hunks)tests/partials/SideNavPartial.test.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
tests/partials/SideNavPartial.test.ts (1)
7-15: LGTM! Enhanced router configuration improves test robustness.The expanded router configuration with explicit component templates for all routes prevents potential navigation errors during testing and provides a more realistic testing environment.
tests/partials/ArticleItemPartial.test.ts (1)
36-44: LGTM! Proper RouterLink stubbing improves test isolation.The RouterLink stub maintains the essential anchor tag structure while removing router dependencies, which is a best practice for component unit testing.
tests/partials/ArticlesListPartial.test.ts (1)
84-94: LGTM! Consistent RouterLink stubbing across test suite.The RouterLink stubbing maintains consistency with other test files in this PR and properly isolates the component from routing concerns.
tests/pages/PostPage.test.ts (2)
47-51: LGTM! Comprehensive @/public.ts mock added.The new mock covers utility functions (
initializeHighlighter,date,getReadingTime) that are likely used in the PostPage component, improving test isolation and preventing missing method errors.
38-44: Mocks correctly targethighlight.js/lib/coreWe’ve confirmed that
src/pages/PostPage.vueimports the core API from'highlight.js/lib/core'(no runtime imports of plain'highlight.js'), so your test mock path is accurate. The mock’s methods—highlightElement,registerLanguage, andregisterAliases—fully cover the component’s usage.No further changes needed.
Summary
Testing
npm testhttps://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6891a9bb4ec883338d3c164d76198b9f
Summary by CodeRabbit