Update create_codeinfo_with_returnvalue

[DarrylGamroth]

• Use Meta.lower for Julia 1.13+ as jl_expand no longer exists

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 19009558008

Details

• 2 of 2 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.06%) to 95.181%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 16829275534:	0.06%
Covered Lines:	79
Relevant Lines:	83

---

💛 - Coveralls

[oxinabox]

Can we have a CI matrix entry created for 1.12 to make sure we didn't break the old functionality?

[oxinabox]

these need to stay.
Or become 1.11 + 1.12
(and add nightly)

because we need to make sure we do not break old versions.

[DarrylGamroth]

No problem! Shouldn't "1" be adequate to cover the latest release (1.12.1)? It would probably be best to include 1.10 as it's LTS over using 1.11.
Let me know and I'll update the pull request. Thanks!

[oxinabox]

what 1 refers to will change over time.
Where as 1.12 won't.
It's probably best to keep testing 1.12 as we had to make changes between for 1.12 support
seperately to the changes for 1.10

We could also test LTS.
But IIRC nothing changed for this between 1.3 and 1.10 as far as this is concerned.

I am not too stressed about this.
But i would rather not drop 1.11 testing,
nor 1.12 testing.

As I know people run this in production systems
and the version they can be on can run a bit behind the latest release.

[DarrylGamroth]

Makes sense, thank you; I added 1.11, 1.12 back.

[oxinabox]

thank you

[oxinabox]

thank you,
tagging a release presently