Skip to content

Add Microsoft SQL Server Database Support #15

@peter7775

Description

@peter7775

Feature Request: Microsoft SQL Server Database Support

Summary

Add comprehensive Microsoft SQL Server support to the SQL Graph Visualizer, extending the existing multi-database architecture that currently supports MySQL and PostgreSQL.

Motivation

Microsoft SQL Server is one of the most widely used enterprise database systems. Adding SQL Server support would:

  • Expand market reach to enterprise customers using SQL Server
  • Enable legacy system modernization through graph visualization
  • Complete the "Big 3" SQL database coverage (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server)
  • Open opportunities in Microsoft-centric environments

Technical Requirements

Core Implementation

  • SQL Server Driver Integration: Implement driver with connection pooling
  • Repository Implementation: Create package
  • Port Adaptation: Implement SQL Server-specific database port interface
  • Factory Integration: Update database factory to support SQL Server selection
  • Configuration Support: Add SQL Server configuration options with authentication methods

SQL Server Specific Features

  • Authentication Methods: Windows Auth, SQL Server Auth, Azure AD
  • Connection String Support: Handle complex SQL Server connection parameters
  • Schema Discovery: SQL Server-specific metadata queries for tables/columns
  • Data Type Mapping: Map SQL Server types to Neo4j properties appropriately
  • Stored Procedure Support: Handle stored procedures in transformation rules

Configuration Example

Testing & Validation

  • Unit Tests: SQL Server repository and connection tests
  • Integration Tests: Full transformation pipeline with SQL Server
  • Docker Environment: SQL Server container setup for development
  • Sample Database: Northwind or similar sample database integration
  • Validation Scripts: Automated testing with SQL Server sample data

Implementation Approach

Phase 1: Core Infrastructure

  1. Add SQL Server driver dependency
  2. Create basic repository structure
  3. Implement connection management
  4. Add configuration support

Phase 2: Query & Schema Support

  1. Implement schema discovery
  2. Add SQL Server-specific query execution
  3. Handle data type conversions
  4. Support for SQL Server metadata queries

Phase 3: Testing & Documentation

  1. Comprehensive test suite
  2. Docker development environment
  3. Documentation and examples
  4. Performance benchmarking

Success Criteria

  • Can connect to SQL Server instances (local and remote)
  • Successfully transforms SQL Server tables to Neo4j nodes
  • Handles SQL Server-specific data types correctly
  • Maintains performance comparable to MySQL/PostgreSQL implementations
  • Comprehensive test coverage (>80%)
  • Complete documentation with examples

Technical Considerations

Challenges

  • Complex Authentication: SQL Server has multiple auth methods
  • Connection Strings: More complex than MySQL/PostgreSQL
  • Data Types: SQL Server has unique types (uniqueidentifier, hierarchyid, etc.)
  • Enterprise Features: May need to handle advanced SQL Server features

Dependencies

    • Official Microsoft SQL Server driver
  • Potential Azure-related packages for cloud authentication

Priority

High - SQL Server is a major enterprise database, this would significantly expand the project's reach.

Labels

, , , , ,

Related

  • Follows the pattern established in Implement PostgreSQL Support #7 (PostgreSQL Support)
  • Part of the multi-database architecture roadmap
  • Could enable future Azure SQL Database support

Technical Complexity: High - requires understanding of SQL Server specifics and enterprise authentication
Expected Impact: High - opens up enterprise market segment
Community Benefit: High - many developers work with SQL Server in enterprise environments

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    backendBackend/server related workdatabaseDatabase related changes - MySQL, Neo4j, queriesenhancementImprovement to existing functionalityequity-eligibleContributions eligible for equity participationfeatureNew feature or functionalityhigh-impactHigh impact features with commercial potentiallevel-advancedRequires deep understanding of the systempriority-highHigh priority - should be addressed soon

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions