Skip to content

Conversation

michael-wojcik
Copy link

Patch to fix issue mentioned in #54

Copy link
Contributor

@danepowell danepowell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome, thanks! I can confirm that this fixes the problem and makes sense as a fix. It's still not 100% deterministic, but it's way less likely to cause conflicts than the old path.

@klausi
Copy link
Collaborator

klausi commented Dec 7, 2019

Thanks, used a bit of a different approach in #72

@klausi klausi closed this Dec 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants