Skip to content

Conversation

@jumski
Copy link
Contributor

@jumski jumski commented Oct 18, 2025

TL;DR

Renamed "Configuring Retries" to "Retrying Steps" and added a new "Validation Steps" guide to improve documentation around error handling patterns.

What changed?

  • Renamed /build/configuring-retries/ to /build/retrying-steps/ for better clarity
  • Added a new guide on /build/validation-steps/ explaining how to properly handle validation errors
  • Enhanced the retry documentation with sections on understanding different failure types
  • Updated all internal links and navigation references to point to the renamed pages
  • Refined the LLM content exclusion list in astro.config.mjs to be more specific about which index pages to exclude

How to test?

  1. Build the website and verify the new page structure:

    • Confirm /build/retrying-steps/ loads correctly with the enhanced content
    • Verify the new /build/validation-steps/ page is accessible
    • Check that all links to the old "Configuring Retries" page redirect properly
  2. Review the content of both pages to ensure they provide clear guidance on:

    • Distinguishing between transient and permanent failures
    • Setting up validation steps with maxAttempts: 1
    • Following best practices for synchronous validation

Why make this change?

Users were confused about when to use retries versus when to fail fast. The documentation needed clearer guidance on handling different types of errors appropriately. By separating validation patterns into their own guide and enhancing the retry documentation, we provide more specific guidance on error handling best practices, helping users build more robust flows that don't waste resources on unnecessary retries.

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 18, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d944958

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor Author

jumski commented Oct 18, 2025

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • merge:queue - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix:queue - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@jumski jumski marked this pull request as ready for review October 18, 2025 19:41
@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Oct 18, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit d944958

Command Status Duration Result
nx test:types:health dsl ✅ Succeeded 15s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-10-18 19:43:17 UTC

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🔍 Preview Deployment: Website

Deployment successful!

🔗 Preview URL: https://pr-263.pgflow.pages.dev

📝 Details:

  • Branch: chore-add-missing-sections
  • Commit: 57e6fe0ca6c2a0890e66d4762a490f555e0330af
  • View Logs

_Last updated: _

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines 234 to +240
{
label: 'Configuring retries',
link: '/build/configuring-retries/',
label: 'Retrying steps',
link: '/build/retrying-steps/',
},
{
label: 'Validation steps',
link: '/build/validation-steps/',

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Add redirect from old retries path

The page rename to /build/retrying-steps/ updates the navigation, but there is no corresponding redirect entry for the previous /build/configuring-retries/ URL. Any external links, bookmarks, or cached search results for the old path will now return 404s. The documentation guidelines in CLAUDE.md require adding redirects when renaming pages. Please add a mapping in redirects.config.mjs to forward /build/configuring-retries/ to /build/retrying-steps/ so historical links continue to work.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🔍 Preview Deployment: Playground

Deployment successful!

🔗 Preview URL: https://pr-263--pgflow-demo.netlify.app

📝 Details:

  • Branch: chore-add-missing-sections
  • Commit: 57e6fe0ca6c2a0890e66d4762a490f555e0330af
  • View Logs

_Last updated: _

@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Oct 18, 2025

Merge activity

  • Oct 18, 10:12 PM UTC: jumski added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Oct 18, 10:12 PM UTC: CI is running for this pull request on a draft pull request (#265) due to your merge queue CI optimization settings.
  • Oct 18, 10:13 PM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue via draft PR: #265.

graphite-app bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2025
### TL;DR

Renamed "Configuring Retries" to "Retrying Steps" and added a new "Validation Steps" guide to improve documentation around error handling patterns.

### What changed?

- Renamed `/build/configuring-retries/` to `/build/retrying-steps/` for better clarity
- Added a new guide on `/build/validation-steps/` explaining how to properly handle validation errors
- Enhanced the retry documentation with sections on understanding different failure types
- Updated all internal links and navigation references to point to the renamed pages
- Refined the LLM content exclusion list in `astro.config.mjs` to be more specific about which index pages to exclude

### How to test?

1. Build the website and verify the new page structure:
   - Confirm `/build/retrying-steps/` loads correctly with the enhanced content
   - Verify the new `/build/validation-steps/` page is accessible
   - Check that all links to the old "Configuring Retries" page redirect properly

2. Review the content of both pages to ensure they provide clear guidance on:
   - Distinguishing between transient and permanent failures
   - Setting up validation steps with `maxAttempts: 1`
   - Following best practices for synchronous validation

### Why make this change?

Users were confused about when to use retries versus when to fail fast. The documentation needed clearer guidance on handling different types of errors appropriately. By separating validation patterns into their own guide and enhancing the retry documentation, we provide more specific guidance on error handling best practices, helping users build more robust flows that don't waste resources on unnecessary retries.
@graphite-app graphite-app bot closed this Oct 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants