-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 704
ticdc: fix wrong names in bidirectional replication (#21928) #21961
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ticdc: fix wrong names in bidirectional replication (#21928) #21961
Conversation
Replaces all instances of 'bi-directional replication' with 'bidirectional replication' across documentation files for consistency. Updates related explanations, configuration references, and limitations to use the unified terminology.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary of ChangesHello @ti-chi-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on improving the clarity and consistency of the documentation by unifying the spelling of "bidirectional replication" throughout the TiDB documentation. This change ensures that all references to this feature use a single, standardized term, enhancing readability and reducing potential confusion for users. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request successfully standardizes the terminology by replacing 'bi-directional replication' with 'bidirectional replication' across multiple documentation files, which enhances consistency. I've identified a minor point of confusion in one of the changed files and provided a suggestion to improve its clarity. Otherwise, the changes look good.
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hfxsd The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #21928
Replaces all instances of 'bi-directional replication' with 'bidirectional replication' across documentation files for consistency. Updates related explanations, configuration references, and limitations to use the unified terminology.
First-time contributors' checklist
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?